Literature Study GuidesLochner V New York

Lochner v. New York | Study Guide

United States Supreme Court

Download a PDF to print or study offline.

Study Guide
Cite This Study Guide

How to Cite This Study Guide

quotation mark graphic
MLA

Bibliography

Course Hero. "Lochner v. New York Study Guide." Course Hero. 21 Dec. 2018. Web. 22 Jan. 2019. <https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Lochner-v-New-York/>.

In text

(Course Hero)

APA

Bibliography

Course Hero. (2018, December 21). Lochner v. New York Study Guide. In Course Hero. Retrieved January 22, 2019, from https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Lochner-v-New-York/

In text

(Course Hero, 2018)

Chicago

Bibliography

Course Hero. "Lochner v. New York Study Guide." December 21, 2018. Accessed January 22, 2019. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Lochner-v-New-York/.

Footnote

Course Hero, "Lochner v. New York Study Guide," December 21, 2018, accessed January 22, 2019, https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Lochner-v-New-York/.

Overview

Author

United States Supreme Court

Year Decided

1905

Type

Primary Source

Genre

U.S. Supreme Court Case

At a Glance

  • In 1895 the New York State Legislature passed the Bakeshop Act with the aim of promoting health and safety in the bakery trade. The act restricted, among other things, the working hours of bakers to 10 hours per day and 60 hours per week.
  • In 1901 bakery owner John Lochner was indicted and fined for violating the "60 hours per week" provision. He challenged the act, appealing his initial guilty verdict in New York State all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • The court framed the case as a contest between two types of legal authority. The 14th Amendment, they found, guaranteed the freedom to enter contracts without undue interference. States, meanwhile, could use their power to restrict individual rights—including the right to contract—if public health and safety demanded it.
  • Balancing New York State's police powers against Lochner's freedom to contract, the court ruled in favor of Lochner. New York, they found, could not prove the act was really a "health law."
  • Dissenters argued that Lochner bore the burden of proving that the act was unconstitutional. Ultimately, their viewpoint has prevailed. Since the end of the "Lochner era" in 1937, the court has been much more restrained in applying the 14th Amendment to labor laws meant to further the rights of workers.

Summary

This study guide for United States Supreme Court's Lochner v. New York offers summary and analysis on themes, symbols, and other literary devices found in the text. Explore Course Hero's library of literature materials, including documents and Q&A pairs.

Buy this book from Amazon.com
Cite This Study Guide

information icon Have study documents to share about Lochner v. New York? Upload them to earn free Course Hero access!