Literature Study GuidesNew York Times V Sullivan

New York Times v. Sullivan | Study Guide

United States Supreme Court

Download a PDF to print or study offline.

Study Guide
Cite This Study Guide

How to Cite This Study Guide

quotation mark graphic
MLA

Bibliography

Course Hero. "New York Times v. Sullivan Study Guide." Course Hero. 21 Dec. 2018. Web. 22 Jan. 2019. <https://www.coursehero.com/lit/New-York-Times-v-Sullivan/>.

In text

(Course Hero)

APA

Bibliography

Course Hero. (2018, December 21). New York Times v. Sullivan Study Guide. In Course Hero. Retrieved January 22, 2019, from https://www.coursehero.com/lit/New-York-Times-v-Sullivan/

In text

(Course Hero, 2018)

Chicago

Bibliography

Course Hero. "New York Times v. Sullivan Study Guide." December 21, 2018. Accessed January 22, 2019. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/New-York-Times-v-Sullivan/.

Footnote

Course Hero, "New York Times v. Sullivan Study Guide," December 21, 2018, accessed January 22, 2019, https://www.coursehero.com/lit/New-York-Times-v-Sullivan/.

Overview

Author

United States Supreme Court

Year Decided

1964

Type

Primary Source

Genre

U.S. Supreme Court Case

At a Glance

  • Martin Luther King Jr., a minister from Montgomery, Alabama, and one of the leaders in the nonviolent struggle for civil rights, was facing felony charges of perjury related to income tax returns. The charges are widely understood to have been part of a strategy by authorities wishing to cripple the civil rights movement.
  • In March 1960 the Committee to Defend Martin Luther King and the Struggle for Freedom in the South published an advertisement in the New York Times. It described the violence King and other activists endured at the hands of the authorities. Montgomery police commissioner L. B. Sullivan sued the newspaper for libel.
  • Although he was not mentioned in the advertisement, Sullivan claimed that information in it was false and damaging to his reputation. After he won his case in Alabama, the New York Times appealed the decision.
  • In 1964 the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which unanimously reversed the Alabama courts' rulings, citing unrestricted public debate as a principle of American democracy.
  • The decision strengthened the 1st Amendment rights of freedom of speech and the press. It was a victory for the civil rights movement, which depended on these freedoms to function.
  • Today, a libel suit for criticizing a public figure is no longer an effective means of silencing opposition.

Summary

This study guide for United States Supreme Court's New York Times v. Sullivan offers summary and analysis on themes, symbols, and other literary devices found in the text. Explore Course Hero's library of literature materials, including documents and Q&A pairs.

Buy this book from Amazon.com
Cite This Study Guide

information icon Have study documents to share about New York Times v. Sullivan? Upload them to earn free Course Hero access!