Course Hero. "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Study Guide." Course Hero. 7 Feb. 2017. Web. 22 Apr. 2018. <https://www.coursehero.com/lit/The-Adventures-of-Sherlock-Holmes/>.
Course Hero. (2017, February 7). The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Study Guide. In Course Hero. Retrieved April 22, 2018, from https://www.coursehero.com/lit/The-Adventures-of-Sherlock-Holmes/
(Course Hero, 2017)
Course Hero. "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Study Guide." February 7, 2017. Accessed April 22, 2018. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/The-Adventures-of-Sherlock-Holmes/.
Course Hero, "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Study Guide," February 7, 2017, accessed April 22, 2018, https://www.coursehero.com/lit/The-Adventures-of-Sherlock-Holmes/.
He never spoke of the softer passions, save with a gibe and a sneer.
Dr. John Watson describes Sherlock Holmes, explaining that because Holmes is such a creature of reason, he looks down on emotions and feelings, seeing them as shortcomings of the unreasonable or immature.
I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data.
Sherlock Holmes refuses to hypothesize about a crime until he has a strong base of good facts. To speculate without knowing the facts is a surefire way to fail. He repeats his belief in good "data" in many of the stories in the book.
As a rule ... the more bizarre a thing is the less mysterious it proves to be.
In Sherlock Holmes's view sensational crimes have so many novel aspects that they easily reveal their clues. Conversely, common crimes are much more difficult to interpret.
I have seen too much not to know that the impression of a woman may be more valuable than the conclusion of an analytical reasoner.
Sherlock Holmes says this to Mrs. St. Clair, the wife of Neville St. Clair. His argument is that "a woman's intuition" has a special power of detection. This idea is repeated in many of the stories throughout the book.
On the contrary, Watson, you can see everything. You fail, however, to reason from what you see. You are too timid in drawing your inferences.
Sherlock Holmes mildly criticizes Dr. John Watson for putting too little effort into his observations. If Watson would only concentrate harder on reasoning, he would increase his observational power. He says this to his friend while they are inspecting the hat Commissionaire Peterson dropped off at Holmes's house.
Dr. Grimesby Roylott spits this sentence at Sherlock Holmes while he is in Holmes's office berating the detective for speaking with his stepdaughter, Helen Stoner. The sentence is a perfect encapsulation of Holmes's life and work.
The mystery clears gradually away as each new discovery furnishes a step which leads on to the complete truth.
Watson explains how crime-solving proceeds: one clue at a time. That clue opens up another clue, and eventually the crime or the culprit is revealed.
I believe in hard work and not in sitting by the fire spinning fine theories.
Lestrade criticizes Sherlock Holmes for being an armchair detective. The Scotland Yard inspector believes crime-solving is a physical process requiring getting outside and hunting for clues. Holmes does hunt for clues, but he likes to think first about how he will go hunting.
My God, what shall I do! I have lost my honour, my gems, and my son in one night.
Holder expresses utter despair over the theft of the Beryl Coronet and highlights the stakes of Sherlock Holmes's crime-solving. Holder's cry is particularly dramatic, but the victims in each story undoubtedly feel the same sense of hopelessness as he does until Holmes is able to help them.
Well, yes, of course the pay is good—too good. That is what makes me uneasy.
Holmes warns Miss Violet Hunter, the young governess who has asked him for advice, that the job she is considering is suspicious. His years of experience have taught him if something seems too good to be true, it most likely is.