Branham v. Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203 (2010)
701 S.E.2d 5, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 18,474
390 S.C. 203
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jesse BRANHAM, Jr., as Guardian ad Litem
for Jesse Branham, III, and Jesse Branham,
FORD MOTOR COM
James v. Meow Media, Inc., 300 F.3d 683 (2002)
169 Ed. Law Rep. 30, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 16,386, 30 Media L. Rep. 2185.
300 F.3d 683
United States Court of Appeals,
Joe JAMES, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants,
MEOW MEDIA, INC., et al., Def
LEXIS-NEXIS Academic Universe - Document
W. O. LUCY AND J. C. LUCY v. A. H. ZEHMER AND IDA S. ZEHMER
Record No. 4272
Supreme Court of Virginia
196 Va. 493; 84 S.E.2d 516; 1
Ramirez v. Plough, Inc., 6 Cal.4th 539 (1993)
863 P.2d 167, 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 97, 62 USLW 2383, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,740.
6 Cal.4th 539
Supreme Court of California
Jorge RAMIREZ, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and
PLOUGH, INC., Defendant and Res
162 N.E. 99
248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99
(Cite as: 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99)
Court of Appeals of New York.
LONG ISLAND R. CO.
FN* Reargument denied 164 N. E. 564.
May 29, 1928.
Action by Helen Palsgraf against the Long Island
Palsgraf v. Long Island R. R. Co.
Background and Facts
Plaintiff is injured by a scale that comes off the end of the platform; injury was a
result of a package containing fireworks falling on the rails and exploding. When a
railway company guard pushes a
Chapter Twelve - Tort Law and McDonalds Coffee Case
One handout goes with this assignment, The McDonalds Coffee Case. Fill out the chart below. First, take
notes, defining each topic (e.g., duty, breach of duty, etc.) Then, relate carefully selected facts
Citation: 64 Food & Drug L.J. 565 2009
Content downloaded/printed from
Fri Nov 6 18:28:14 2015
- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance
of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license