in expectation damages. After Qr-resrar appealed rhe decision
to the intermediate aopeliate couff, the stare s higl.resr coun,
on ics on'n initizrtive. decided to
anci nile on the cixe be-
lrY' Nv b
cause of the
E Btu N tlre ncu' 1 car i
nor been acl.rieved. As a result, Thrash
remo\r rhe rop 6 ft of fill
maceriirl and t].re concrere footings rhat
irad already been installed for rhe for-rndarion and ro redo the n'ork in accors'as ordered ro
with the plans and specifi
r.- Lt w-^
sr-rbsranriai amounr ofshale. The om.isbills for rhe additional har-rling.
sion apparendy caused Mullins to haul tl -'
much more material away from the site
tlran ir lrad conremplated.
dre owner tesdfied
livan (C*S) as tire lorv bidcler, CaS had
in its rvinning bid a prebid
quore of 57,808,983 from Dynalectric for the electricirl scope of work. Although Dynalectric had assured CaS
thar its bid x'as accluate, after learn
N l,IOSt CONSTRUCTION dis-
the wodds of contract larv
1a*'do not collide. The
former is based on an enforceable rvritten or verbai agreement, whereas the
latrer stems from a "personal wrong"
committed, such as negiigence.
Co^9hn h,^- Ca'ra
con'rmonly recognized exceptions in
such clauses. Tl-re ciause here statrtj, "Conrrattor slrall rcteive no compensation for delay or l-rindrance of the
\(/orK.gvEN IF SUCH DELAY oR
HINDRA\TCE RESULTS FROM.THE
sign and pirrr
BIDDING AND ESTIMATING
The Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) has established a specific terminology to indicate
the relationship among the documents. Each term is defined below.
The Basic Relationsh
Among the Various Do
Proiect Delivery Methods
lnteglrated Proiect Delivery