7.3 Explain some of the arguments that favor and oppose allowing jurors to ask questions of witnesses
during a criminal trial.
The practice of permitting jurors to ask questions in criminal cases is quite a controversial subject, here
are some of the argu
1.1 Describe and distinguish among the three approaches to studying criminal justice systems by taking
an international perspective.
Comparative criminal justice is a subfield of the study of Criminal Justice that relates different justice
systems from ar
Aaron Beach: Group Chair
Discussion Assignment #1
Which remedy is the most effective, and why?
We believe that the exclusionary rule is the most effective remedy for a violation of
Constitutional rights for many reas
Wyman v. Newhouse, 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937).
Capsule Summary: A judgment based on service of process procured by fraud is invalid.
Facts: Wyman (Prosecutor (P), a resident of Florida, and Newhouse (Defendant (D) were both married
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Majewski, House of Lords, 2 All E.R. 142 (1976).
Capsule Summary: Voluntary intoxication is a good defense to general intent crimes.
Facts: Majewski (Defendant) and a friend went to the Bull public
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
Capsule Summary: The First Amendment to protect speech even that intended for emotional distress
protects public figures.
Facts: An issue of Hustler Magazine featured a parody of a
Davis v. Precoat Metals (WL 1759828 (N.D. Ill. 2002)
Capsule Summary: The plaintiffs motion to compel discovery under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is
Facts: Accusers/plaintiffs were Latino and black workers who wo