Question 2 (Offer and Acceptance)
Was there any intention to create legally binding contract between Casssie and John or
Cassie and Jenna or Cassie, John and Jenna?
Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven; Hyde v Wrench; Carlill v Carbolic Smoke B
Tutorial Question week 5
Question 1 (Term; Exclusion Clauses)
Was the contract between Peter and MDS breached by MDS employee?
Luna Park Ltd v. Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd
Associated News Papers v Bancks
Applying Luna Pa
Tutorial question week 9 ACL
Under the Australian Consumer Law, Was Jean-Don a manufacturer?
Section 7 Australian Consumer Law
Under section 7, Jean-Don was a manufacture of French Flyer in Australian. Firstly,
Tutorial Question week 11
a) There is a valid partnership in this case because a partnership agreement is made between
partners to carry on an IT business for the purpose of making profit. Also, under the
agreement, the partners have obligation
Tutorial Question week 10
Question 1 (Samantha v Jean- Don)
a) 1. Issue
Did Jean Don owe Samantha duty of care?
Donoghue v Stevenson
Swain v Waverley Municipal council
Jean Don owes a duty of care to Samantha. Since Samantha particip
Student name: Thu Hoai Mai - s2828868
Tutorial class: Thursday 1pm
Tutorial Questions week 11
Did Kevin owe a duty of care to Darryl? Has he breached the duty under tort of negligence?
Hackshaw v Shaw
Consolidated Broken Hill Lt
Week 4 Tutorial Questions
Question 1 ( Legal intention)
Kathy v Kim
Did Kim and Kathy intend to create a legally binding contract?
Simpkin v Pays; Trevey v Grub
Applying Simpkin v Pays, even though it is a social arrangement (