University of Baltimore logo * We aren't endorsed by this school

BULA 151 Business Law

  • Average Course Rating (from 2 Students)

    5.0/5
    Overall Rating Breakdown
    • 2 Advice
    • 5
      100%
    • 4
      0%
    • 3
      0%
    • 2
      0%
    • 1
      0%
  • Course Difficulty Rating

    • Easy 100%

    • Medium 0%

    • Hard 0%

  • Top Course Tags

    Competitive Classmates

    Great Discussions

    Group Projects

* We aren't endorsed by this school

Business Law Questions & Answers

Business Law Flashcards

Business Law Advice

Business Law Documents

Showing 1 to 30 of 41

Sort by:
{[$select.selected.label]}

Business Law Questions & Answers


Business Law Advice

Showing 1 to 2 of 2

View all
    • Profile picture
    Aug 10, 2017
    | Would highly recommend.

    Pretty easy, overall.

    Course Overview:

    it has a great class discussion

    Course highlights:

    about blue ocean strategy, group presentation, and discussion.

    Hours per week:

    0-2 hours

    Advice for students:

    read book, involve in group discussion.

    • Fall 2017
    • Jeffrey Rhoades
    • Yes
    • Group Projects Competitive Classmates Great Discussions
    • Profile picture
    Mar 18, 2017
    | Would highly recommend.

    Pretty easy, overall.

    Course Overview:

    Easy course professor gives you everything from the text book.

    Course highlights:

    Learned how to completed briefs and research information on law courses.

    Hours per week:

    0-2 hours

    Advice for students:

    Complete all Case Briefs on time. Facts: Mr. James Halbman was a minor who worked at a gas station located in Greenfield, WI. Mr. Halbman paid $1,000 in cash for a car, with a payment plan for the remaining amount of money due on the car. He took the car took to a garage a month later because a connecting rod in the engine broke and had repairs totaling $637.40 done to the car, which he didn't pay. Mr. Lemke later transferred title of the car in an attempt to avoid being liable for the car he sold to Mr. Halbman. Mr. Halbman then returned the title, disaffirmed the contract and sought recovery of his money. He also left the car at the repair shop, and the repair shop took possession of the car. The repair shop removed the engine, and transmission to satisfy the debt that was owed to them. The repair shop then had the car towed to Mr. Halbman's fathers home where it was later vandalized, and this made it unsalvageable. Issues: Can a minor who has disaffirmed a contract for the purchase of property which was not a necessity and gave the property back to the vendor still be liable? Also does the minor have to make restitution for damage to the property prior to the disaffirmance? Holdings: A minor who disaffirms a contract can recover the price of the property without liability for use, depreciation, damage, or other diminution in value. Rationale: The minor has absolute right to disaffirm a contract for the purchase of items which are not necessities. The infancy doctrine gives the minor the ability to disaffirm the contract. The doctrine is designed to protect minors.

    • Fall 2016
    • William Brice
    • Yes
    • Lots of Writing Requires Lots of Research

Ask a homework question - tutors are online