. . . .Gmmu @m .m.z NE .Sm .m .3. I.
WnWme new hwm. "($3. .u .A .0 .5333 .133 2.1 we 5833mm mm nommewnwwWri
. .33 ME mo Ewan mmumnn .E unuEummumE or: E ouwmsumm 9 Em: w uwnm.
.um mg 3% 9 mm om mEmquuwm 2.? E 3.33.: WE 2.35 Hermann 393m m $253. 0 an:
.1. - .-.,. w.
For example, in Eikind v. Liggett S: Myers, Inc,5 the Second Circuit
We have no doubt that a company may so involve itself in the preparation
of reports and projections by outsiders as to assume a duty to correct
q, o; 45', as sadism], appeal
, , cellos, ,9 names case in which the
or ad been orgariitldd long before the adoption of a statute
orporategisto brilliance or [educational institutions, the
Supreme Court of Newr Jersey iipheld a gift of $1500
Nixon v. Blackwell
626 A.2d 1366 (1993)
Supreme Court of Delaware
Minority shareholders, nonemployees, of closely held corporation sued directors, the majority
shareholders, alleging breach of duciary duty as result of allegedly discriminatory policy that