Case Study 2-1: Interfering with the Employees Right to Unionize (pg. 73)
1. Do you believe Fortin was the victim if antiunion discrimination by her employer? Why or why
I believe she was because as they stated in the case study things started to cha
1. The union claimed that the employees lost a benefit when the company changed the use of
compensatory time for illness. In light of the fact that the use was permitted if the employee had
no sick leave available, how were the employees damaged?
Case Study 5-1
1. Do you believe the company was or was not bound to sign the agreement? Explain?
I do not believe the company was bound to sign the agreement. I believe there was clearly some
confusion on who had authority due to the comments Jarvis made