G.R. No. 184517.
October 8, 2013.*
SME BANK, INC., ABELARDO P. SAMSON, OLGA
SAMSON and AURELIO VILLAFLOR, JR., petitioners, vs.
PEREGRIN T. DE GUZMAN, EDUARDO M. AGUSTIN,
JR., ELICERIO GASPAR, RICARDO GASPAR, JR.,
EUFEMIA ROSETE, FIDEL ESPIRITU, SIMEON
G.R. No. 193857.
November 28, 2012.*
MA. MERCEDES L. BARBA, petitioner, vs. LICEO DE
CAGAYAN UNIVERSITY, respondent.
Remedial Law Civil Procedure Motion for Reconsideration
Section 2, Rule 52 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as
amended, provides that
VOL. 20, AUGUST 10, 1967
Board of Liquidators vs, Kalaw
No. L18805. August 14, 1967,
THE BOARD OF LIQUIDATORS
GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE
vs. HEIRS OF
MAXIMO M. KALAW, JUAN BOCAR,
ESTATE OF T
VOL. 276, AUGUST 7, 1997
Loyola Grand Villas Homeowners (South) Association, Inc.
vs. Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 117188. August 7, 1997.
LOYOLA GRAND VILLAS HOMEOWNERS (SOUTH)
ASSOCIATION, INC., petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF
APPEALS, HOME INSURANCE A
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Abejo vs. De la Cruz
No. L63558. May 19, 1987.
SPOUSES JOSE ABE JO AND AURORA ABEJO,
TELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., petitioners, vs. HON.
RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ, JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT (NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL
G.R. No. 170770.
January 9, 2013.*
VITALIANO N. AGUIRRE II and FIDEL N. AGUIRRE,
petitioners, vs. FQB+7, INC., NATHANIEL D. BOCOBO,
PRISCILA BOCOBO and ANTONIO DE VILLA,
Corporation Law Dissolution of Corporations Section 122 of
G.R. No. 157900.
July 22, 2013.*
ZUELLIG FREIGHT AND CARGO SYSTEMS, petitioner,
vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and
RONALDO V. SAN MIGUEL, respondents.
Remedial Law Special Civil Actions Certiorari Grave Abuse
of Discretion Words and Phrases In a
G.R. No. 202079.
June 10, 2013.*
FILESTATE GOLF AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and FIL
ESTATE LAND, INC., petitioners, vs. VERTEX SALES
AND TRADING, INC., respondent.
Corporation Law Shares of Stocks Ownership In a sale of
shares of stock, physical delivery of a s
[No. 19893. March 31, 1923]
ARNALDO F. DE SILVA, plaintiff and appellant, vs.
ABOITIZ & COMPANY, INC., defendant and appellee.
SUBSCRIPTION.The defendant corporation being an
artificial entity created by virtue of the Cor
Pardo vs. The Hercules Lumber Co., Inc. and Ferrer,
47 Phil. 964, No. 22442 August 1, 1924
STOCKHOLDERS' RlGHT TO INSPECT RECORDS; UNREASONABLE RESTRICTION BY
DlRECTORS ON RlGHT OF INSPECTION.
A resolution of the board of directors of a corporation limiti
Rizal Light & Ice Co., Inc. vs. Mun. of Morong, Rizal
25 SCRA 285, No. L-20993, No. L-21221 September 28, 1968
Protection-of-investment rule"; When not applicable; Paramount consideration in the grant of
certificate of public convenience; To whom duty to
Barba vs. Liceo de Cagayan University, 686 SCRA 648, G.R. No. 193857 November 28, 2012
Corporate officers are elected or appointed by the directors or stockholders, and are those who
are given that character either by the Corporation Code or by the corpor
Ampil v Office of the Ombudsman
Oscar, an unsecured creditor of ASB Realty, filed a
case for Falsification of Public Documents against
Atty. Policarpio, Francis, Yvonne and Gema. He
also filed a criminal case for violation of the AntiGraft and Corrupt Pra
Republic of the Philippines
G.R. No. 137842
August 23, 2001
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee,
DANILO CATUBIG y HORIO, accused-appellant.
In an information, dated 29 January 1998, the accused, Danilo
Section 14. (1) No person shall be held to answer for
a criminal offense without due process of law.
thereby. People vs. Horio.
(2) In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be
presumed innocent until the contrary is proved, and
shall enjoy the righ
Section 12. (1) Any person under investigation of the
commission of an offense shall have the right to be
informed of his right to remain silent and to have a
competent and independent counsel preferably of
his own choice. If the person cannot afford the
Section 21. No person shall be twice put in jeopardy
of punishment for the same offense. If an act is
punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or
acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to
another prosecution for the same act.
Dismissal at Pre
Section 13. All persons, except those charged with
offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when
evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction,
ba bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on
recognizance as may be provided by law. The righ
Section 20. No person shall be imprisoned for debt
or non0payment of a poll tax.
1. Explain the prohibition against imprisonment for
The cases touching on the subject reveal
that the constitutional prohibition, stated in
full, means this: No person
Section 18. (1) No person shall be detained solely by
reason of his political beliefs and aspirations.
(2) No involuntary servitude in any form shall exist
except as a punishment for a crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted.
1. May the Sta
Section 19. (1) Excessive fines shall not be imposed,
nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment
inflicted. Neither shall death penalty be imposed,
unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous
crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it. Any
Section 16. All persons shall have the right to a
speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial,
quasi-judicial, or administrative bodies.
by Mayor Binay in the SC praying that the denial
of his motion for reconsideration be set aside
and claims t
Section 17. No person shall be compelled to be a
witness against himself.
paragraph of article 483 provides that one who
illegally detains another and fails to give
information concerning his whereabouts, or does
not prove that he set him at liberty, shal
Section 15. The privilege of the writ of habeas
corpus shall not be suspended except in cases of
invasion or rebellion when the public safety requires
1. What is a writ of habeas corpus?
It is defined as a writ directed to the person
Bataclan v. Medina (Duration of Responsibility)
PROXIMATE CAUSE: that cause, which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient
intervening cause, produces the injury, and without which the result would not have occurred.
Maersk Lines vs. CA
Facts: Private respondent ordered from Eli Lilly. Inc. of Puerto Rico through its (Eli Lilly, Inc.'s) agent in
the Philippines, Elanco Products, 600,000 empty gelatin capsules for the manufacture of hip
pharmaceutical products. The goo
LIABILITY OF REGISTERED OWNER
PCI Leasing & Finance v. UCPB General Insurance (GR 162267, July 4 2008)
PCI leased one of its tanker truck to SUGECO; the same truck figured in an accident with a car
(Mits Lancer) owned by UCPB and insured by herein