Air France vs.
No. L21438.September 28, 1966.
AIR FRANCE, petitioner,vs. RAFAEL CARRASCOSO and the HONORABLE COURT OF
Common carriersContracts First class tickets.A written document speaks a
Shipping Lines, Inc. vs.
UCPB General Insurance
G.R. No. 146018.June 25, 2003.
EDGAR COKALIONG SHIPPING LINES, INC., petitioner,vs.UCPB GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, INC., respondent.
Ganzon vs. Court of
No. L48757.May 30, 1988.
MAURO GANZON, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and GELACIO E. TUMAMBING,
Civil Law ObligationsContracts Common CarriersPerfection of contract of carria
VOL. 164, AUGUST
Compania Maritima vs.
Court of Appeals
No. L31379.August 29, 1988.
COMPANIA MARITIMA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and VICENTE CONCEPCION,
Civil LawCommon CarriersPresumption of liability of common carriers
and Industrial Supply,
vs. Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 102316.June 30, 1997.
VALENZUELA HARDWOOD AND INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS AND SEVEN BROTHERS SHIPPING CORPORA
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Saludo, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 95536. March 23, 1992.
ANICETO G. SALUDO, JR., MARIA SALVACION
SALUDO, LEOPOLDO G. SALUDO and SATURNINO G.
SALUDO, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
TRANS WORLD AIRLINES
De Guzman vs. Court of
No. L47822.December 22, 1988.
PEDRO DE GUZMAN, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ERNESTO CENDAA,
Common CarriersDefinition ofArt. 1732 of the Civil Code makes no distinct
Calvo vs. UCPB General
Insurance Co., Inc.
G.R. No. 148496.March 19, 2002.
VIRGINES CALVO doing business under the name and style TRANSORIENT CONTAINER
TERMINAL SERVICES, INC., petitioner,vs. UCPB GENERAL INSURANCE CO
Gatchalian vs. Delim
G.R. No. 56487.October 21, 1991.
REYNALDA GATCHALIAN, petitioner, vs. ARSENIO DELIM and the HON. COURT OF
Civil LawCommon CarriersWaiverTo be valid and effective, a waiver mu
G.R. No. 122039.May 31, 2000.
VICENTE CALALAS, petitioner,vs. COURT OF APPEALS, ELIZA JUJEURCHE SUNGA and
FRANCISCO SALVA, respondents.
JudgmentsRes JudicataThe principle of res judicata does not apply where a party in a pending case
was never a party i
Roque vs. Buan
No. L22459.October 31, 1967.
ANTONIO V. ROQUE, petitioner,vs.BIENVENIDO P. BUAN, ET AL., respondents.
Remedial law EvidenceWhere decision of Court of Appeals on controversial matters suffers from
vs. Court of Appeals
G.R. No. 125948.December 29, 1998.
FIRST PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, petitioner,vs. COURT OF APPEALS,
HONORABLE PATERNO V. TACAN, BATANGAS CITY and ADORA
VOL. 454, MARCH
Corporation vs. Court of
G.R. No. 137775.March 31, 2005.
FGU INSURANCE CORPORATION, petitioner,vs.THE COURT OF APPEALS, SAN MIGUEL
CORPORATION, and ESTATE OF ANG GUI, represented by LUCIO, JULIAN, and J
Fabre, Jr. vs. Court of
G.R. No. 111127.July 26, 1996.
MR. & MRS. ENGRACIO FABRE, JR. andPORFIRIO CABIL, petitioners, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS, THE WORD FOR THE WORLD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP, INC., AMYLINE
G.R. No. 210929, July 29, 2015
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EDNA ORCELINO-VILLANUEVA, Respondent.
In this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, the Office of the Solicitor General
VALERIO E. KALAW,
G.R. No. 166357
- versus -
CORONA, C.J., Chairperson,
DEL CASTILLO, and
MA. ELENA FERNANDEZ,
September 19, 2011
DEL CASTILLO, J.:
G.R. No. 189121
July 31, 2013
AMELIA GARCIA-QUIAZON, JENNETH QUIAZON and MARIA JENNIFER
MA. LOURDES BELEN, for and in behalf of MARIA LOURDES ELISE
This is a Petition for Review on Certior
G.R. No. 171557, February 12, 2014
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. RODOLFO O. DE GRACIA, Respondent.
Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari1 are the Decision2 dated June 2, 2005 and Resolution3dated
G.R. No. 192718, February 18, 2015
ROBERT F. MALLILIN, Petitioner, v. LUZ G. JAMESOLAMIN AND THE REPUBLIC OF THE
This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court assail
G.R. No. 187061, October 08, 2014
CELERINA J. SANTOS, Petitioner, v. RICARDO T. SANTOS, Respondent.
The proper remedy for a judicial declaration of presumptive death obtained by extrinsic fraud is an action to
annul the judgment. An a
G.R. No. 184621
December 10, 2013
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner,
MARIA FE ESPINOSA CANTOR, Respondent.
The petition for review on certiorari before us assails the decision dated August 27, 2008 of the
Court of Appeals (CA
BACKGROUND, BASIC CONCEPT
AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Historical background of land titles.
In the early days, land was literally free to all who might come
and get it, just as free as the air and the sea. People were nomads,
roaming from place to
36. PNB VS. JOSE GARCIA ET. AL. DIGEST
Facts: Jose Sr., without the knowledge and consent of his children executed SPAs authorizing spouses Garcia to convey a
property covered with TCT No. T-44422 to secure a loan from PNB by way of mortgage and an Amendm
2012 criminal law bar questions
The wife of AAA predeceased his mother-in-law. AAA was accused of
defrauding his mother-in-law under a criminal information for estafa,
but the actual recital of facts of the offense charged therein, if proven,
Pathfinder on Legal Research
(Arranged alphabetically by author/editor)
Prepared by J.T. Sahagun, Law Librarian
Sources on the analytical study into the methodology of legal resear
G.R. No. 179620
August 26, 2008
MANUEL G. ALMELOR, petitioner,
THE HON. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF LAS PIAS CITY, BRANCH 254,
and LEONIDA T. ALMELOR, respondents.
REYES, R.T., J.:
MARRIAGE, in its totality, involves the spouses' right to the com