PAJUYO VS CA & GUEVARRA
The issue in this case is whether there is a contract of commodatum between
Pajuyo and Guevarra.
Pajuyo built a house made of light materials on a rented lot. He executed a
Kasunduan with Guevarra wherein the latter would li
PEOPLE VS PUIG & PORRAS
The issue in this case is whether a contract of loan governs the deposits received
by the bank from its clients, making it the right party to institute the case against the
One hundred twelve informations of Qual
BPI INVESTMENT VS CA & ALS MANAGEMENT
The issue in this case is whether the defendant defaulted in fulfilling its obligation
in a contract of loan.
Roa contracted a loan with BPI Investments for the construction of his house with
such house as coll
PANTALEON VS AMERICAN EXPRESS
The issue in this case is whether American Express had the obligation to approve
and accept within a specified time the offers of Pantaleon.
Pantaleon and his family went on a guided Europe tour. The following day, the
REPUBLIC VS BAGTAS
The issue in this case is whether the defendant is liable for the death of the thing
Bagtas borrowed from the Republic 3 bulls for breeding. When the bulls were
delivered, each had an appraisal value together with a stipu
QUINTOS VS BECK
The issue is this case is whether the defendant complied with his obligation of the
Beck leased Quintos house. After novation of their contract, Quintos allowed Beck to
use her furniture on the condition that the latter wo
CIR VS BURROUGHS LTD & CTA
The issue in this case is whether a future law has retroactive effect with regard
the contract of the parties.
Burroughs Limited was a foreign corporation licensed to do business in the
Philippines. It applied with Centra
GARCIA VS THIO
The issue in this case is whether respondent contracted a loan with plaintiff.
Garcia issued checks worth $300,000.00 and P500,000.00 to Thio in 2 separate
occasions. The checks were crossed and made payable to Marilou Santiago. For
PRODUCERS BANK VS CA & VIVES
The issue in this case is whether the contract between plaintiff and private
respondent is of commodatum.
Doronilla asked Vives to deposit P200,000.00 in the bank for Sterela where the
former was the owner, for purposes
SAURA DEVELOPMENT VS DBP
The issue in this case is whether the defendant failed to perform its obligation of
Saura Development applied for a loan of P500,000.00 at RFC, the predecessor
of DBP, for the construction of a jute mill in Da