G.R. No. L-16218
November 29, 1962
ANTONIA BICERRA, DOMINGO BICERRA, BERNARDO BICERRA, CAYETANO BICERRA, LINDA BICERRA, PIO
BICERRA and EUFRICINA BICERRA, plaintiffs-appellants,
TOMASA TENEZA and BENJAMIN BARBOSA, defendants-appellees.
G.R. No. 132529. February 2, 2001
SUSAN NICDAO CARIO, petitioner,
SUSAN YEE CARIO, respondent.
The issue for resolution in the case at bar hinges on the validity of the two
marriages contracted by the deceased SPO4 Santia
G.R. No. 86355 May 31, 1990
JOSE MODEQUILLO, petitioner,
HON. AUGUSTO V. BREVA FRANCISCO SALINAS, FLORIPER ABELLANSALINAS, JUANITO CULAN-CULAN and DEPUTY SHERIFF FERNANDO
Josefina Brandares-Almazan for petitioner.
ABC Law Offices fo
G.R. No. 105625 January 24, 1994
MARISSA BENITEZ-BADUA, petitioner,
COURT OF APPEALS, VICTORIA BENITEZ LIRIO AND FEODOR BENITEZ AGUILAR,
Reynaldo M. Alcantara for petitioner.
Augustus Cesar E. Azura for private respondents.
G.R. No. 100835 October 26, 1993
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner,
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and the SPOUSES JAMES ANTHONY
HUGHES and LENITA MABUNAY HUGHES, respondents.
The Solicitor General for petitioner.
Westremundo y. De Guzman for pr
G.R. No. L-68374 June 18, 1985
HORACIO LUNA and LIBERTY HIZON-LUNA, petitioners,
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, HON ROQUE A. TAMAYO, as
Presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court, NCR Branch CXXXI1 Makati,
Metro Manila, MARIA LOURDES SANTOS, and SIXTO SAL
G.R. No. 85723 June 19, 1995
BIENVENIDO RODRIGUEZ, petitioner,
COURT OF APPEALS and CLARITO AGBULOS, respondents.
This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court of
the Decision of the Court of Appe
G.R. No. 113054 March 16, 1995
LEOUEL SANTOS, SR., petitioner-appellant,
COURT OF APPEALS, and SPOUSES LEOPOLDO and OFELIA BEDIA,
In this petition for review, we are asked to overturn the decision of the Court
G.R. No. 97906 May 21, 1992
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner,
COURT OF APPEALS and MAXIMO WONG, respondents.
Public Attorney's Office for private respondent.
Petitioner seeks to set aside the judgment of respondent Court of Appeal
G.R. No. L-32054 May 15, 1974
TERESITA LLANETA (known also as TERESITA LLANETA FERRER and
TERESITA FERRER), petitioner,
The Honorable CORAZON JULIANO AGRAVA, as Presiding Judge of the
Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Manila, respondent.
G.R. No. L-26462
June 9, 1969
TERESITA C. YAPTINCHAY, petitioner,
HON. GUILLERMO E. TORRES, Judge of the Court of First Instance of
Rizal, Pasig Branch; VIRGINIA Y. YAPTINCHAY, in her own behalf and
in her capacity as Special Administratrix in the Int
G.R. No. L-45870 May 11, 1984
MARGARET MAXEY assisted by Santiago Magbanua; FLORENCE MAXEY assisted
by Ofrecinio Santos; and LUCILLE MAXEY, petitioners,
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and THE SPOUSES BEATO C. MACAYRA
and ALACOPUE MONDAY, respondents.
G.R. No. L-23482
August 30, 1968
ALFONSO LACSON, petitioner,
CARMEN SAN JOSE-LACSON and THE COURT OF APPEALS,
-G.R. No. L-23767
August 30, 1968
CARMEN SAN JOSE-LACSON, plaintiff-appellant,
ALFONSO LACSON, defendant-appellee.
G.R. No. L-21533
June 29, 1967
HERMOGENES MARAMBA, plaintiff-appellant,
NIEVES DE LOZANO, ET AL., defendants-appellees.
N. Tanopo, Jr. and Millora for plaintiff-appellant.Manuel Ancheta
and Bausa, Ampil and Suarez for defendants-appellees.
G.R. No. L-14309
June 30, 1960
CALTEX (PHILIPPINES) INC., petitioner,
FELISA FELIAS, respondent.
A.P. Deen and Eddy A. Deen for petitioner.Leopoldo Picazo for
This is a petition for certiorari to review the decision of the
G.R. No. L-25594
October 18, 1926
Intestate Estate of Francisco Derayunan, deceased. ELISA
NICOMEDES DERAYUNAN, administrator-appellee.
NARCISO DERAYUNAN, appellee.
Lutero and Lutero for appellant. Arroyo and Evangelist
G.R. No. L-57499 June 22, 1984
MERCEDES CALIMLIM- CANULLAS, petitioner,
HON. WILLELMO FORTUN, Judge, Court of First instance of
Pangasinan, Branch I, and CORAZON DAGUINES, respondents.
Fernandez Law Offices for petitioner.
Francisco Pulido for respond
.R. No. L-22320
July 29, 1968
MERCEDES RUTH COBB-PEREZ and DAMASO P. PEREZ, petitioners,
HON. GREGORIO LANTIN, Judge of the Court of First Instance of
Manila, RICARDO P. HERMOSO and the CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA,
Crispin D. Baizas and Associ
G.R. No. L-25659
October 31, 1969
LUZON SURETY CO., INC., petitioner,
JOSEFA AGUIRRE DE GARCIA, VICENTE GARCIA and the FOURTH DIVISION OF
THE COURT OF APPEALS, respondents.
Tolentino and Garcia and D. R. Cruz for petitioner. Rodolfo J. Herman for resp
G.R. No. L-8190
May 28, 1958
GONZALO GARCIA, plaintiff-appellant,
CONSOLACION MANZANO, defendant-appellee.
Fernandez and Benedicto and Primo L. Agsaoay for appellant.Diokno and
Sison and De Santos, Herrera and Delfino for appellee.
REYES, J.B.L., J.:
G.R. No. 118305 February 12, 1998
Under Article 161 of the Civil Code, what debts and obligati
G.R. No. 82606 December 18, 1992
PRIMA PARTOSA-JO, petitioner,
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and HO HANG (with aliases
JOSE JO and CONSING), respondents.
The herein private respondent, Jose Jo, admits to having cohabited with
three women an
G.R. No. 146504
April 9, 2002
HONORIO L. CARLOS, petitioner,
MANUEL T. ABELARDO, respondent.
Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of
Court is the decision of the Court of Appeals dated November 10,
G.R. No. L-13114
August 29, 1961
ELENITA LEDESMA SILVA, ET AL., plaintiffs-appellants,
ESTHER PERALTA, defendant-appellee.
E.B. Garcia Law Offices and Ledesma, Puno Guytingco and Antonio &
Associates for plaintiffs-appellants.Quijano, Abellera, Santos
G.R. No. L-32026 January 16, 1986
RE: PETITION FOR DECLARATION OF ABSENCE OF ROBERTO L.
REYES. ERLINDA REYNOSO REYES, petitioner,
HON, JOSE P. ALEJANDRO, in his capacity as Judge, Court of First
Instance of Cavite, Branch II, Cavite City, respondents.
2011 CASE DOCTRINES IN REMEDIAL LAW
Prepared by Glenn Rey Anino
Palaganas vs. Palaganas, 640 SCRA 538 , January 26, 2011
Civil Law; Probate Proceedings; Wills and Succession; Our laws do not prohibit the probate of
wills executed by foreigners abroad alth
WARNING! DOUBLE CHECK IF THE CASES (CONTENTS) ARE CORRECT. :)
1. UMALI VS. ESTANISLAO 209 SCRA 446
Congress enacted RA 7167 entitled An act adjusting the basic personal and
additional exemptions allowable to individuals for income tax purposes to t
Bicerra v. Teneza [G.R. No. L-16218. November 29, 1962.]
Bicerra v. Teneza
[G.R. No. L-16218. November 29, 1962.]
En Banc, Makalintal (J): 10 concur.
FACTS: The Bicerras are supposedly the owners of the house worth P200, built on a lot owned by them in La
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE No. 1067 December 31, 1976
A DECREE INSTITUTING A WATER CODE, THEREBY REVISING AND CONSOLIDATING THE LAWS
GOVERNING THE OWNERSHIP, APPROPRIATION, UTILIZATION, EXPLOITATION, DEVELOPMENT,
CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF W