any.
3.- mm._.
E. mmd
E. 3.2:
3.- 3.9.
mar on.
m. m
n 3on
ca. um
omnnaaqsa
Bo.
n3.
man.
as U. a.
S. n 6.3.3 .,._.
Eb. 2. mm;
ems. 9. 9.2:
mi. 3. 2.21
mum. E. S.n
a. m. m
_ on
umaunm
3on 32an0
zaunu 33
Intrasurgical Suite Time 2 (Incision to Dressing End): After addition of the first model, it
was found that 47.9% of the variance in the dependent variable, ISST2, was accounted for by all
control var
Research Question 2b: Scrub Degree of Specialization and OR Process Time
To test the hypothesis that total OR process time is a function of scrub degree of
specialization in general surgery, controlli
Turnover Time: After addition of the first model. it was found that 12.6% of the variance in the
dependent variable. TOX. was accounted for by all control variables as they were added in the
rst block
moo.
ooo.
moo.
moo.
ooo.
mg. n m
a. "9% 5.5
moo.
wow.
wow.
no. 3.2-
mw. vodka
mo. 35$
2.- mmmZ-
mm. 3.29
m. m
n .553
ooo.
woo.
woo.
ooo.
53 u. a.
on? H ER .3 an.
at.
3v.
moo.
3.
mo.
2.
mm.
m m.
_ 3on
mmo.
cos.
we.
moo.
coo.
8.3m 531
52. n 9%.: in am .5 u 33 .5
mg. 93. was", E
at E. E
ma. 3. m
3.03 BEAUEco
8. RE. Egga spam
2&5? Hannah33
5. on? so. 9. 3% PE EB
8. ti Go. mo. 3.5 M $4 333
:. 38:. m8.
_ac.
aao.
m_m.
mam. mo.
_ny. o_.
we. _.
an. war
ego. _n.
a. .Q
n_uvoyg
mpmuum
gym unnan._v ,m
m:
mini
96m.
mmm
2:.
Duo.
an.
one.
_qovm
a: n Ham .3 n 3.
mac. umnmgumm
mac. m
m :m. m
332 BuEEcU
3.35303.
Intrasurgical Suite Time 3 (Dressing End to Patient Out): After addition of the first
model, it was found that 3.5% of the variance in the dependent variable, ISST3, was accounted
for by all control v
m3.
2:.
.96.
man.
coo.
mg." a
so. u 8%.: in.
co.
8.
S.
E.
n
n ung
Sam.
.36
5.3:
mnm.
Sm
coo.
coo.
mam.
:3.
:3.
En.
can.
58. u a
a s n 933 am
we magma
mac. m.
m _ m. m
3.32 BuEEOD
Essie". 35
2% E5 532q
Research Question 3: Circulators-Scrub Dyad Consistency and OR Process Time
To test the hypothesis that total OR process time is a function of circulatorscrub dyad
consistency, controlling for number
Intrasurgical Suite Time 2 (Incision to Dressing End): After addition of the rst model, it
was found that 47.9% of the variance in the dependent variable, ISST2, was accounted for by all
control varia
a; u. m 5a.: u. a
a? u. 9% .2 3m 3.2 u 9% .3 3H
m5. mg. umzu um
93. may. m.
mnm. mmm. E
3.32 Euco
mmo. Q . nd. nozmuuaa nEum
sags 235%;
mbm. mo. 8.? mmm. 3. Run PPM in?
mmo. :. 9:? Sn. 2. 3.99 mdmd 33
mwm.
Ea.
mmo.
a2.
m3.
men. n a
55 u 63 d in
me. 3.-
Q. on
.9. 3.2:
. 3.3.
5. up .n
a. m
n Eva?
wmc.
m3.
mam.
mqovm
men n ma .5 in
ms. magma
mmo. m.
o9. m.
3on EDEEoO
nonmumn Liam
mEmE> Euwnuam
2 . mm
one.
one.
39
:5.
ago.
van.-
mu.
3.
E .
am.
m.
n 333
mod v a
m? n ma .5 at.
36 T
madam
mm dan
vmvm T
3.5
moo.
mat.
web.
:3.
m5.
:5.
3o.
av.
E.
E .
3.
m.
332
33 v a.
2.3 n ma 6 am
53. magnum
can. um
59
E. u a 53 v a.
23 n 9%.: an 3.3" 9.2.3 3.
:5. 9%. was hm
5w. 93. mm
Sn. och. m
3.32 33:30
E. 3. mama. BEES 3.5
2% E5 532qu
coo. ow. R. _ mm coo. ow. mo. 5n gum in?
39. 2. RES m5. 2. Sumo: mmdm
:5. E .
8.0 v a 53 u. a.
2. u 3% .5 3m an? u 8.3 i. am
m8. 0%. was". E
at 8. x
2:. 2:. a
$32 33an0
:8. S. 8.2- 533339. ow
35%.; Hogan.3
:8. z. 2.3 98. 2. 8.5 EE x53
3:. :. 38$ 25. 2. ES: 23 :23
:3. E . 5.32-
Intrasurgieal Suite Time 2 (Incision to Dressing End): After addition of the rst model, it
was found that 47.9% of the variance in the dependent variable, ISST2, was accounted for by all
control varia
Turnover Time: After addition of the first model. it was found that 12.6% of the variance in the
dependent variable. TOX. was accounted for by all control variables as they were added in the
rst block
Turnover Time: After addition of the rst model, it was found that 12.6% of the variance in the
dependent variable, TOX, was accounted for by all control variables as they were added in the
rst block (
mg.
53.
39
mac.
one.
an.-
9.
2.
mm.
m
n 3602
may. n m and v 9.
ad n 3%.: 3m 2.8 n max. am
08. E. was". m
m3. at. x.
mm. mam. m.
3.33 32an0
22mg- 35:53 35
2:55: Eugen$3
mnwn can. 9. 3 .En Dbm 03
om .mm
E. u. a. mod . a.
as. . 3%.: a: mg. n mam. .5
go. as. maa.
m8. RD. E
3. 0%. x
$on 3.356
E. 5. 3:- 35:33.6
9323., novnoauu
:5. :. a; E. :. m: 53%?
0. 9. 3: m8. 2. 2.2: 223.3
mm. 3. 3.5. m3. 3. 2.9. Egu
Total OR Process Time: After addition of the first model, it was found that 49.0% of the
variance in the dependent variable, total OR process time, was accounted for by all control
variables as they w
an." m
m: L335
an.
i. 3.
RD. :_
so. mp.-
55. a.
a. m.
n 332
m3.
com.
m5 .
mmN
mm .mS
wamn-
mmh
mm.mm.
35.
con.
Sc.
52. u. a.
5: 9.33 gm
3.
mar
on.
a.
F 333
Run
mmdg
charm-
5.9
mg.
mg.
mmm.
um mm
m
m
E
Summary of Results for Research Question 2b
To test the hypothesis that total OR process time is a function of the scrubs degree of
specialization in general surgery, controlling for number of staff s
Intrasurgieal Suite Time 3 (Dressing End to Patient Out): After addition of the rst
model. it was found that 3.5% of the variance in the dependent variable. ISST3. was accounted
for by all control var
Summary of Results for Research Question 2a
To test the hypothesis that total OR process time is a function of the circulators degree of
specialization in general surgery, controlling for number of st
mmb.
02.
ve.
0mm.
000.
E. n a
2. man 63
me.
me.
H H.
For
E.
m
m 3ch
mm.
E6
will
imw-
36w
coo.
mac.
mm.
:3.
two.
Em.
coo.
mo.
2.
no;
Hm.
%
_ Eva:
Bed w m
was u Emmi Em
wa
5.31
we. mm-
modw
mg mmmm
m3 m
Total OR Process Time: After addition of the first model, it was found that 49.0% of the
variance in the dependent variable, total OR process time, was accounted for by all control
variables as they w
Total OR Process Time: After addition of the first model, it was found that 49.0% of the
variance in the dependent variable, total OR process time, was accounted for by all control
variables as they w