The Role of the GATT in Reducing Barriers to Trade

What you’ll learn to do: differentiate between alternative international trade regimes and how they impact global trade

Every country must adopt a policy on international trade. Free trade is one option, as is autarky (no international trade), and everything in between. Political pressures to protect special interests collide with those promoting the benefits of free trade. The result is a country's trade policy, which is often a compromise between competing politics.

Reducing Barriers to Trade

As you know, tariffs are taxes that governments place on imported goods for a variety of reasons. Some of these reasons include protecting sensitive industries, for humanitarian reasons, and protecting against dumping. Traditionally, tariffs were often used as a political tool to protect certain vested economic, social, and cultural interests.

At the beginning of the Great Depression in 1930, the U.S. Congress passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act to protect American jobs and industries from foreign competition. This act raised U.S. tariffs on dutiable imports to nearly 60%. U.S. trading partners retaliated by raising their own tariffs on U.S. exports, with the result that international trade between the [warring] nations declined by half. The consensus among economists is that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs contributed significantly to the depth and length of the Great Depression.

At the end of World War II, there was a consensus that tariffs were too high worldwide, and that tariff reductions could stimulate international trade and return the world to a thriving, peacetime economy. In the years after the Great Depression and World War II, there was a worldwide push to build institutions that would tie the nations of the world together. The United Nations officially came into existence in 1945. The World Bank, which assists the poorest people in the world, and the International Monetary Fund, which addresses issues raised by international financial transactions, were both created in 1946. The third planned organization was to be an International Trade Organization, which would manage international trade. The United Nations was unable to agree to this. Instead, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), was established in 1947 to provide a forum in which nations could come together to negotiate reductions in tariffs and other barriers to trade. In 1995, the GATT was transformed into the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The GATT process was to negotiate an agreement to reduce barriers to trade, sign that agreement, pause for a while, and then start negotiating the next agreement. The rounds of talks in the GATT, and now the WTO, are shown in Table 1. Notice that the early rounds of GATT talks took a relatively short time, included a small number of countries, and focused almost entirely on reducing tariffs. Since the 1970s, however, rounds of trade talks have taken years, included a large number of countries, and an ever-broadening range of issues.

Table 1. The Negotiating Rounds of GATT and the World Trade Organization

Year	Place or Name of Round	Main Subjects	Number of Countries Involved
1947	Geneva	Tariff reduction	23
1949	Annecy	Tariff reduction	13
1951	Torquay	Tariff reduction	38
1956	Geneva	Tariff reduction	26
1960–61	Dillon round	Tariff reduction	26
1964–67	Kennedy round	Tariffs, anti-dumping measures	62
1973–79	Tokyo round	Tariffs, nontariff barriers	102
1986–94	Uruguay round	Tariffs, nontariff barriers, services, intellectual property, dispute settlement, textiles, agriculture, creation of WTO	123
2001–	Doha round	Agriculture, services, intellectual property, competition, investment, environment, dispute settlement	147

The sluggish pace of GATT negotiations led to an old joke that GATT really stood for Gentleman's Agreement to Talk and Talk. The slow pace of international trade talks, however, is understandable, even sensible. Having dozens of nations agree to any treaty is a lengthy process. GATT often set up separate trading rules for certain industries, like agriculture, and separate trading rules for certain countries, like the low-income countries. There were rules, exceptions to rules, opportunities to opt out of rules, and precise wording to be fought over in every case.

Licenses and Attributions