View the step-by-step solution to:

Concerning capacity, which is true?

Concerning capacity, which is true?

  1. A person who lacks capacity to contract may nevertheless be compelled to pay the reasonable value for necessities furnished by another party.
  2. The defense of intoxication is an excellent contract defense, roughly equivalent in quality to infancy and incompetency.
  3. One who entered into a contract while intoxicated need not later disaffirm the contract in order to avoid being bounded by it because such contract is void.
  4. As a general rule, an adult's contract with a minor is voidable at the option of either party.

Concerning consideration, which of the following is a true statement?

  1. Promises in Requirements Contracts are not illusionary, even though such contracts do not specify an exact quantity of goods to be purchased.
  2. The inadequacy of consideration is usually a good basis to avoid a contract.
  3. An Exclusive Dealing Contract is one type of contract which is illusory because it lacks consideration.
  4. Moral obligations and consideration given in the past can usually be used to support the consideration element in a current exchange.

Top Answer

The correct answers are 2. The defense of intoxication is an excellent... View the full answer

Sign up to view the full answer

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

-

Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Ask a homework question - tutors are online