View the step-by-step solution to:


Rosie was a teacher at the Perth Alternative Learning School, until recently. The School is a subsidiary of Many

Options Limited, a public corporation originally formed in Western Australia. The School employed Rosie for four years, on a full time basis. She worked with two other teachers and reported to Wendy, a director of the School. There are 30 students at the School. Last month a new School policy was introduced to improve the standard of behaviour of the students. The policy prohibits chewing gum anywhere on the School grounds and applies to all staff and students. Rosie chews gum habitually, something she picked up when she was a teenager. Rosie was caught chewing gum yesterday while she was in the bathroom and Wendy warned her she would be dismissed if caught again. This morning, by the fountain at the entrance to the School, Wendy walked past Rosie and saw her chewing gum again. When she later entered the School building Wendy came straight up to her and dismissed he Advise Wendy whether

(a) Dismissing Rosie was lawful at common law.

(b) Rosie can make a legislative claim that she has been harshly dismissed.

Use IRAC way. AUSTRALIA employment law

Top Answer

Dismissing Rosie is very unlawful under the Australian laws as it is not consistent with the Small Business... View the full answer

Sign up to view the full answer

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question