the risk of a terrorist attack can be quantified as the sum of Threat multiplied by Probability. How threat and probability are assessed is open to debate so even this purportedly objective definition is, to a large extent, subjective. The quantification of risk as it relates to psychological impact seems to have too many dimensions for an accurate assessment to be made. Are the social psychological aspects of Risk Management important? What's more important: Assessing who becomes a terrorist or how to control victims' perceptions of risk? President Trump pledged to eradicate radical Islamic terrorism from the face of earth? Does this make you feel safer?
Social psychological aspects of Risk Management are of much importance since they prepare individuals psychologically of the... View the full answer