View the step-by-step solution to:



This case involves a derivative lawsuit filed by shareholders because of decisions of the Walt Disney Company's board of directors, approving an executive compensation contract for Michael Ovitz, as well as impliedly approving a non-fault termination that resulted in a award to Ovitz (allegedly exceeding $140 million) after barely one year of employment. Michael Eisner, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the Walt Disney Company, had been Eisner's close friend for over 25 years. Eisner decided to hire Ovitz despite internal memos questioning both the hiring decision and the lucrative compensation terms. However, none of these documents were submitted to the board before hiring Ovitz. In fact, no discussions or presentations were made until the actual meeting where the compensation committee was asked to Ok the agreement. The compensation committee met for just under an hour. All that occurred during the meeting regarding Ovitz's employment was that one member reviewed the employment terms with the committee and answered a few questions. Immediately thereafter, the committee adopted a resolution of approval. ISSUE Were the board's actions protected under the business judgment rule? Please discuss. Please provide support documentation from your text in your written answer.

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.


Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question