View the step-by-step solution to:

The tart actions include:

The tart actions include: Negligence, Negligent infliction of emotional distress, Breach of duty of care, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Assault, Battery, False Imprisonment, Conversion, Transferred intent, and Comparative negligence. Below are the possible plaintiff’s, defendants, and elements of the tort claim that constitute the plaintiff’s claim:
1. Buy-Mart v Randy – Negligence
2. Buy-Mart v Lee – Conversion
3. Randy v Buy-Mart – Comparative negligence
4. Lady v Lee – Battery, negligence, breach of duty of care, res ipsa loquitur
5. Man v Lee - Negligent infliction of emotional distress
6. Randy v Lee – Battery
7. Boy v Randy or Buy-Mart – Battery, negligence, res ipsa loquitur, negligence, breach of duty of care, transferred intent
8. Lee v Security Guard – Assault, battery, false imprisonment
One defense is comparative negligence for the sales clerk, Randy, for leaving the bullets and gun out of his sight while ringing up a customer, Lee. Another defense would be against battery for self-defense and defense of others when struggling with Lee. A defense against false imprisonment would arise because it was a necessity and self-defense. A defense against

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

-

Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question