Fred is liable because he was put on notice of the presence of the substance. Ginger is not liable because she did not have actual knowledge.
Ginger is liable because she is the one who purchased the building. Fred is not liable, even though he had actual knowledge, because he did not purchase the building.
Neither Ginger nor Fred are liable personally, nor is the partnership, as they did not put the substance in the building.
Both Ginger and Fred are liable, regardless of the circumstances, by virtue of the fact that they are partners.
Recently Asked Questions
- What do you mean by the term Return on Investment (ROI).
- Explain how country-level risks play a role in the overall risks of operating internationally. Provide some examples of such risks. Need at least one page plus
- . Imagine you are Robin Chase and you are seeking funding for Zipcar to launch and expand. Based on the information provided in the case, describe what you