Fred is liable because he was put on notice of the presence of the substance. Ginger is not liable because she did not have actual knowledge.
Ginger is liable because she is the one who purchased the building. Fred is not liable, even though he had actual knowledge, because he did not purchase the building.
Neither Ginger nor Fred are liable personally, nor is the partnership, as they did not put the substance in the building.
Both Ginger and Fred are liable, regardless of the circumstances, by virtue of the fact that they are partners.
This question was asked on Oct 21, 2013.
Recently Asked Questions
- How can i use a function with reference parameter and how can return this parameter to main?
- Research Paper: Topic Instructions Choose a criminal law topic and submit it, along with a 100-word rationale for choosing the selected topic, to the
- Use the following information for Jett Co. to answer questions 20. * Show your work