This question has been answered
Question
Hello all, Can you help me with this assignment? Please see the attached file.
The first one is my teacher's requirement and the others are 5 sources as his requested.
Thank you!
ARGUMENT PAPER ASSIGNMENT SHEET
Find a source that is making an argument that you fnd interesTng. (±his will be your main source ²or the paper.) ±his source can be
one o² the readings ²rom Gra³ & Birkenstein, or it can be a source you fnd on your own. Your paper will be a response to this source.
Present the argument and make responses to the argument using ²urther research. In the end, show how your understanding o² the
argument has changed. Do you agree with it more or less than you did when you frst read it? Do you disagree with it more or less
than you did when you frst read it?
(1)
±ell me which main source you are going to write about. ±his is either one o² the readings ²rom Gra³ & Birkenstein or
another source (making an argument) that you have ²ound. Give me an author name and an arTcle name, as well as the
name o² the periodical it appears in, i² it does.
Requirements:
±here are no ²ormat requirements. Write in whole sentences.
Grading Rubric Weights
Sentence Quality (20%):
Paper makes strong sentences!
Paper meets standards o² grammar, mechanics, and ²ormality set ²orth in Writer’s Re²erence
.
Assignment/Format (80%):
Paper meets assignment requirements ²or content.
Paper meets source count.
Grade will be part o² the acTviTes grade ²or the quarter.
ARGUMENT DRAFT (due Monday, December 1).
Write a paper with the ²ollowing outline:
IntroducTon:
One or two paragraphs that show the reader what is interesTng and important about the controversy the main source argument is
involved in. You can describe the conversaTon that the main source is parTcipaTng in. At the end o² the introducTon, tell the reader
what the overall claim that your paper will be making.
Main source summary:
One paragraph that summarizes the argument o² your main source.
Responses:
At least ²our paragraphs that respond to di³erent points in the main source argument. ±hese responses will be pa´erned on the
Argument Response ±emplate Sheets. You can use any ±emplates ²rom the two sheets. You can use the same ±emplate mulTple
Tmes, but do try to have some variety. Each o² these paragraphs will develop the response with in²ormaTon ²rom at least one
addiTonal source.
Conclusion:
One or two paragraphs that show how your understanding of the main source’s argument has changed aFer your responses. You can
consider the following quesTons: what do you want the reader to think aFer you’ve shown them your responses and your further
sources? Is the main source argument stronger than it was before? Weaker? Is it more complicated? ±his secTon should refer back to
the points made in the previous paragraphs, but not in a repeTTous way.
Requirements:
²our pages.
²ive sources minimum (one main source and at least four addiTonal sources).
QuotaTons allowed, but there should be more paraphrase than quotaTon.
MLA format.
Grading Rubric Weights
Length: 30%
Source Count: 40%
Format: 20%
Assignment: 10%
Grade will be part of the acTviTes grade for the quarter.
ARGUMENT PAPER (due Tuesday, December 8 – Final Exam Session).
Revise the DraF per my notes & syllabus guidelines.
Grading Rubric Weights (
see above for explanatons
):
Sentence Quality (30%)
Paragraph Construc±on (20%):
Paragraphs have an ISSUE porTon and a DISCUSSION porTon: the paragraph thesis is in the ISSUE porTon, and evidence from the
sources is in the DISCUSSION porTon. DISCUSSION porTon is longer than the ISSUE porTon.
Paragraphs are well developed (DISCUSSION porTon is su³ciently large).
Paragraphs ´ow coherently from sentence to sentence.
Paragraphs begin with a transiTon phrase or sentence signaling the shiF in ISSUE from the previous paragraph.
Sources (30%):
Paper meets source count.
Each body paragraph uses at least one source.
±here is more paraphrase than quotaTon.
Format (10%):
Page layout, in-text citaTons, and bibliography is in MLA format.
Assignment (10%):
Paper meets length requirements.
Revision procedures per syllabus have been followed.
A year ago, few folks were talking about Sheryl Sandberg. Her thoughts on feminism were of little
interest. More significantly, there was next-to-no public discussion of feminist thinking and practice.
Rarely, if ever, was there any feminist book mentioned as a bestseller and certainly not included on
the
New York Times
Best Seller list. Those of us who have devoted lifetimes to teaching and writing
theory, explaining to the world the ins and outs of feminist thinking and practice, have experienced
that the primary audience for our work is an academic sub-culture. In recent years, discussions of
feminism have not evoked animated passion in audiences. We were far more likely to hear that we
are living in a post-feminist society than to hear voices clamoring to learn more about feminism. This
seems to have changed with Sandberg’s book
Lean In,
holding steady on the
Times
bestseller list for
more than sixteen weeks.
No one was more surprised than long-time advocates of feminist thinking and practice to learn via
mass media that a new high priestess of feminist movement was on the rise. Suddenly, as if by
magic, mass media brought into public consciousness conversations about feminism, reframing the
scope and politics through an amazing feat of advertising. At the center of this drama was a young,
high-level corporate executive, Sheryl Sandberg, who was dubbed by Oprah Winfrey and other
popular culture pundits as “the new voice of revolutionary feminism.”
Forbes Magazine
proclaimed
Sandberg to be one of the most influential women in the world, if not the most.
Time
Magazine
ranked her one of a hundred of the most powerful and influential world leaders. All over
mass media, her book
Lean In
has been lauded as a necessary new feminist manifesto.
Yet Sandberg confesses to readers that she has not been a strong advocate of feminist movement;
that like many women of her generation, she hesitated when it came to aligning herself with feminist
concerns. She explains:
I headed into college believing that the feminists of the sixties and seventies had
done the hard work of achieving equality for my generations. And yet, if anyone had
called me a feminist I would have quickly corrected that notion…. On one hand, I
started a group to encourage more women to major in economics and government. On the
other hand, I would have denied being in any way, shape, or form a feminist. None of
my college friends thought of themselves as feminists either. It saddens me to admit
that we did not see the backlash against women around us…. In our defense, my friends
and I truly, if naively, believed that the world did not need feminists anymore.
Although Sandberg revised her perspective on feminism, she did not turn towards primary sources
(the work of feminist theorists) to broaden her understanding. In her book, she offers a simplistic
description of the feminist movement based on women gaining equal rights with men. This
construction of simple categories (women and men) was long ago challenged by visionary feminist
thinkers, particularly individual black women/women of color. These thinkers insisted that everyone
acknowledge and understand the myriad ways race, class, sexuality, and many other aspects of
identity and difference made explicit that there was never and is no simple homogenous gendered
identity that we could call “women” struggling to be equal with men. In fact, the reality was and is that
privileged white women often experience a greater sense of solidarity with men of their same class
than with poor white women or women of color.
Sandberg’s definition of feminism begins and ends with the notion that it’s all about gender equality
within the existing social system. From this perspective, the structures of imperialist white
supremacist capitalist patriarchy need not be challenged. And she makes it seem that privileged
white men will eagerly choose to extend the benefits of corporate capitalism to white women who
have the courage to ‘lean in.’ It almost seems as if Sandberg sees women’s lack of perseverance as
more the problem than systemic inequality. Sandberg effectively uses her race and class power and
privilege to promote a narrow definition of feminism that obscures and undermines visionary feminist
concerns.
Contrast her definition of feminism with the one I offered more than twenty years ago in
Feminist
Theory From Margin To Center
and then again in
Feminism Is For Everybody
. Offering a broader
definition of feminism, one that does not conjure up a battle between the sexes (i.e. women against
men), I state: “Simply put, feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and
oppression.” No matter their standpoint, anyone who advocates feminist politics needs to understand
the work does not end with the fight for equality of opportunity within the existing patriarchal
structure. We must understand that challenging and dismantling patriarchy is at the core of
contemporary feminist struggle – this is essential and necessary if women and men are to be truly
liberated from outmoded sexist thinking and actions.
Ironically, Sandberg’s work would not have captured the attention of progressives, particularly men,
if she had not packaged the message of “lets go forward and work as equals within white male
corporate elites” in the wrapping paper of feminism. In the “one hundred most influential people in
the world” issue of
Time Magazine
, the forty-three-year old Facebook COO was dubbed by the
doyen of women’s liberation movement Gloria Steinem in her short commentary with the heading
“feminism’s new boss.” That same magazine carried a full page ad for the book
Lean In: Women,
Work, and The Will to Lead
that carried the heading “Inspire the graduate in your Life” with a
graduating picture of two white females and one white male. The ad included this quote from
Sandberg’s commencement speech at Barnard College in 2011: “I hope that you have the ambition
to lean in to your career and run the world. Because the world needs you to change it.” One can only
speculate whether running the world is a call to support and perpetuate first world imperialism. This
is precisely the type of feel good declaration Sandberg makes that in no way clarifies the embedded
agenda she supports.
Certainly, her vision of individual women leaning in at the corporate table does not include any clear
statements of which group of women she is speaking to and about, and the “lean in” woman is never
End of preview
I am proud of my bona Fdes on supporting the advancement of women. It
angers me to think how slow executive suites and boardrooms are to
welcome more qualiFed females.
Stubborn gender wage gaps
for
comparable work are unacceptable and must be closed.
However, with all of the attention and focus on supporting equal
opportunities for women, we have taken our eyes o± an alarming trend.
Young men in the US are in trouble by any measure of educational
attainment. It’s a big deal and, for reasons of political correctness, we aren’t
talking enough about this growing national problem.
I refuse to believe the support of young American’s progress is a zero-sum
game — that somehow if we call attention to the problem and take a
di±erent approach to improve the experience and outcomes of boys it would
come at the expense of celebrating and enabling continued advancement of
girls. We can and must recognize the unique challenges of young men and
we had better start doing something about it now.
Have you taken a stroll on a college campus recently? Where have the men
gone? In the
latest census
, males comprise 51% of the total US population
between the ages of 18-24. Yet, just over 40% of today’s college students are
men. In fact, in each year since 1982, more American women than men
have
received bachelor’s degrees
Over the last decade two million more
women graduated from college than men. And the gap continues to grow.
Michael Thompson, author of
Raising Cain
, a great book on the plight of
young males, illustrates the path we are going down with a startling
extrapolation. He notes that if today’s trends continue unaltered, the last
young man in the US to get a college degree will do so in 2068. Scary stu±.
The gender achievement gap is astounding. The average 11th grade boy
writes at the level of the average 8th grade girl. Men are signiFcantly
underperforming women. According to a recent
NBC news report
, women
dominate high school honor rolls and now make up more than 70% of class
valedictorians.
Again, I am happy to see women succeeding. But can we really a±ord for our
country’s young men to fall so far behind? A growing education attainment
gap has profound consequences for the economy.
It mattered far less during the industrial era when young men in this country
could Fnd good high-wage jobs in the manufacturing sector without a college
degree or post-secondary credential. In a post-industrial economy, the social
contract has changed. The deal used to be that college was only for a narrow
segment of our population. Everyone else willing to work hard could make
enough money to raise a family and achieve the American dream of owning
a home, without higher education. With the disappearance of those industrial
era jobs, the rug got pulled out from under that assumption. We replaced it
with a new social contract by which a college degree, or at least some form
of post-secondary credential, was a necessity for anyone hoping to make a
decent living. The numbers on this are clear. According to census data,
annual earnings for high-school dropouts average $18,900; for high-school
graduates, $25,900; for college graduates, $45,400. Add up those numbers
over a lifetime and the importance of education comes into focus.
And that’s if there is a job at all. Take a look at how hard the current
recession has hit men. Of the jobs lost over the last four years 78% of them
were held by men. That leaves 20% of working age men out of work. These
jobs are not coming back and men are ill prepared for the 21st century
workplace.
If you dig deeper and
examine these trends
for young men of color it will
make you cry. At the
Business Innovation Factory
, our team has been working
with the College Board to explore the experience of young men of color in
the U.S. The statistics are staggering. Only 26% of African American, 18% of
Latino American, and 24% of Native American and Paci±c Islander young
men ages 24-34 have attained at least an Associates Degree. BIF and the
College Board are bringing the voice and experience of young men of color to
the center of an innovation conversation on how to turn these disturbing
trends around. You can watch a short video trailer about our ongoing
work
here
.
We think equal progress will only come when the US has transformed its
education system from a one-size-±ts-all pipeline responding to the learning
needs of all young men and women in the same way to an individualized
approach where every student can ±nd his or her own pathway. We must go
from a system geared toward enrollment to one designed around the goal of
completion.
In some way, we must turn schools into places that recognize the speci±c
learning needs of young men and help them prepare for 21st century jobs —
and we must do so urgently, or leave an entire generation foundering.
What Would You Do If You Weren't Afraid?
My grandmother Rosalind Einhorn was born exactly fifty-two years before I was, on
August 28, 1917.
Like many poor Jewish families in the boroughs of New York City, hers lived in a
small, crowded
apartment close to their relatives. Her parents, aunts, and uncles addressed her male
cousins by their
given names, but she and her sister were referred to only as "Girlie."
During the Depression, my grandmother was pulled out of Morris High School to
help support the
household by sewing fabric flowers onto undergarments that her mother could resell
for a tiny profit.
No one in the community would have considered taking a boy out of school. A boy's
education was
the family's hope to move up the financial and social ladder. Education for girls,
however, was less
important both financially, since they were unlikely to contribute to the family's
income, and
culturally, since boys were expected to study the Torah while girls were expected to
run a "proper
home." Luckily for my grandmother, a local teacher insisted that her parents put her
back into school.
She went on not only to finish high school but to graduate from U.C. Berkeley.
After college, "Girlie" worked selling pocketbooks and accessories at David's Fifth
Avenue. When
she left her job to marry my grandfather, family legend has it that David's had to hire
four people to
replace her. Years later, when my grandfather's paint business was struggling, she
jumped in and took
some of the hard steps he was reluctant to take, helping to save the family from
financial ruin. She
displayed her business acumen again in her forties. After being diagnosed with
breast cancer, she beat
it and then dedicated herself to raising money for the clinic that treated her by selling
knockoff
watches out of the trunk of her car. Girlie ended up with a profit margin that Apple
would envy. I have
never met anyone with more energy and determination than my grandmother. When
Warren Buffett
talks about competing against only half of the population, I think about her and
wonder how different
her life might have been if she had been born half a century later.
When my grandmother had children of her own — my mother and her two brothers
— she
emphasized education for all of them. My mother attended the University of
Pennsylvania, where
classes were coed. When she graduated in 1965 with a degree in French literature,
she surveyed a
workforce that she believed consisted of two career options for women: teaching or
nursing. She chose
teaching. She began a Ph.D. program, got married, and then dropped out when she
became pregnant
with me. It was thought to be a sign of weakness if a husband needed his wife's help
to support their
family, so my mother became a stay-at-home parent and an active volunteer. The
centuries-old
division of labor stood.
End of preview
Lately, the raging debate about issues of "work-life
balance" has focused on whether or not women can "have
it all." Entirely lost in this debate is the growing strain of
work-life balance on men, who today are feeling the
competing demands of work and home as much or more
than women. And the truth is as shocking as it is obvious:
No one can have it all
The baby has a heartbeat.
The ultrasound shows ten fuzzy
Fngers and ten fuzzy toes and a tiny crescent-moon mouth that
will soon let out the Frst of many wails. We have chosen not to
Fnd out the gender, and when the question comes, as it does
every day, we say we have no preference. Ten Fngers, ten toes. A
wail in the delivery room would be nice. But in private, just us,
we talk. About the pros and cons of boys versus girls, and about
whether it would be better, more advantageous, to be born a boy
or a girl right now. It's a toss-up, or maybe just a draw —
impossible to say that a boy
or
a girl born in America in 2013 has
any conspicuous advantages because of his or her gender.
Consider the facts: Nearly 60 percent of the bachelor's degrees in
this country today go to women. Same number for graduate
degrees. There are about as many women in the workforce as
men, and according to Hanna Rosin's 2012 book,
The End of
Men,
of the Ffteen professions projected to grow the fastest over
the coming years, twelve are currently dominated by women. Per
a 2010 study by James Chung of Reach Advisors, unmarried
childless women under thirty and with full-time jobs earn 8
percent more than their male peers in 147 out of 150 of the
largest U. S. cities. The accomplishments that underlie those
numbers are real and world-historic, and through the grueling
work of generations of women, men and women are as equal as
they have ever been. Adding to that the greater male
predisposition to ADHD, alcoholism, and drug abuse, women
have nothing but momentum coming out of young adulthood —
the big mo! — and then.
..
Well, what exactly? Why don't women hold more than 15 percent
of
Fortune
500 executive-o±cer positions in America? Why are
they stalled below 20 percent of Congress? Why does the
average woman earn only seventy-seven pennies for every dollar
made by the average man? Childbirth plays a role, knocking
ambitious women of their proFessional stride For months (iF not
years) at a time while their male peers go chug-chug-chugging
along, but then why do some women still make it to the top while
others Fall by the wayside? Institutional sexism and pay
discrimination are still ugly realities, but with the millions in
annual penalties levied on ofending businesses (and the
attendant PR shitstorms), they have become increasingly, and
thankFully, uncommon. College majors count (women still
dominate education, men engineering), as do career choices, yet
none oF these on their own explains why the opportunity gap
between the sexes has all but closed yet a stark achievement
gap persists.
±or a Fuller explanation, the national conversation oF late has
settled on a single issue — work-liFe balance — with two voices in
particular dominating: The ²rst belongs to Former State
Department policy chieF Anne-Marie Slaughter, whose essay
"Why Women Still Can't Have It All" was the most widely read
story ever on
The Atlantic
's Web site and landed her a book deal
and spots on
Today
and
Colbert.
Slaughter's twelve-thousand-
word story relies on personal anecdotes mixed with wonk talk: "I
still strongly believe that women can 'have it all' (and that men
can too). I believe that we can 'have it all at the same time.' But
not today, not with the way America's economy and society are
currently structured." The scarcity oF Female leaders to efect
public and corporate change on behalF oF women; the in³exibility
oF the traditional workday; the prevalence oF what she calls "
'time macho' — a relentless competition to work harder, stay
later, pull more all-nighters, travel around the world and bill the
extra hours that the international date line afords you." All these
Factors conspire to deprive women oF "it all." (The "it" in question
being like Potter Stewart's de²nition oF pornography: You know it
when you have it.)
The second, and altogether more grown-up, voice belongs to
±acebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, whose "sort oF Feminist"
maniFesto
Lean In
urges women to command a seat at any table
oF their choosing. Like Slaughter, Sandberg reFerences the usual
systemic challenges, but what it really boils down to, Sandberg
argues, is what Aretha ±ranklin and Annie Lennox prescribed
back in the eighties: Sisters Doin' It For Themselves. Sandberg
encourages women to negotiate harder, be more assertive, and
Forget about being liked and concentrate instead on letting 'er
rip. She believes that women can, and should, determine the
pace and scope oF their own careers, and For her audacity in
assigning some agency to the women oF America, her critics
End of preview
84
JULY/AUGUST 2012
THE ATLANTIC
THE ATLANTIC
JULY/AUGUST 2012
85
Why
Women
Still
Can’t
Have
It
All
it’s t±me to stop
fooling ourselves, says
a woman who left a position of power: the women
who have managed to be both mothers and top
professionals are superhuman, rich, or self-
employed. If we truly believe in equal opportunity
for all women, here’s what has to change.
By
anne-M²r±e ³l²ughter
PHILLIP TOLEDANO
End of preview
Answered by Expert Tutors
, dictum vitae odio. Done
ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna.
doc
Other answer
ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec al
usce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante
ipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec
amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultr
ia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, conse
usce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue v
llentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Na
a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet.
usce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante
, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam
443,685 students got unstuck by Course
Hero in the last week
Our Expert Tutors provide step by step solutions to help you excel in your courses