3-5 page paper discussing the federalist premise that some social issues are best left to the determination of individual states, as that premise relates to the expansion of individual liberties examined in the referenced cases below. After your research and review of these cases, and based on your analysis, provide a defense of either strict constructionism or judicial activism in the decision-making process utilized by the Courts throughout contemporary American history. Post your paper as an attachment to this Discussion Board.
- Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857)
- Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896)
- Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)
- Griswold v. Connecticut, (1965)
- Loving v. Virginia, (1967)
- Roe v. Wade, (1973)
- Lawrence v. Texas, (2003)
- Van Orden v. Perry, (2004)
- Obergefell v. Hodges, (2015)
Recently Asked Questions
- Please refer to the attachment to answer this question. This question was created from AGEC 203 homework 9.
- the definition of 3.1.4 is given at the bottom. how do i use the ito integral to verify that equation.
- when it is appropriate to use the trade-off process. What conditions apply, and the technical evaluation criteria that might be used?