View the step-by-step solution to:


David was tried for armed robbery. The presentation of the prosecution occupied the first day. In the morning, the

prosecutor brought out by relevant testimony of eyewitnesses to the robbery that the accused had in his possession a sawed-off shotgun with which he threatened his victims. At the beginning of the afternoon session, the prosecutor brought to counsel table a shotgun (not sawed-off) and some other physical objects. All these things could be seen by the jury. The prosecutor introduced into evidence the other objects as related to the robbery as what were taken from the victims, but the shotgun was never referred to by any further testimony, and no other weapon was introduced into evidence.

     The State rested and the Defense moved for a mistrial because of the presence of the shotgun. As judge, would you grant the mistrial? What is you reason for your answer?

Top Answer

Sign up to view the full answer

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.


Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question