View the step-by-step solution to:


Crespo was indicted for unlawful possession of cocaine. Crespo made a motion to suppress the evidence seized by a

police officer on a warrantless stop of the Defendant's car. At the suppression hearing, the police officer testified that he worked with the MEG and that an informant had told the officer that the cocaine would be in the car at that time. The informant did not testify, and the informant was not able to state that a meeting between the defendant and another person was the meeting where the defendant purchased the cocaine. The police officer was also not able to provide other examples of this informant's accurate and reliable information.

        As the judge, how would you rule on the motion to suppress?

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask ( soon) You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes