Roark rails against the concept of having anyone alter his designs and goes to great lengths to ensure the integrity of his work. Drawing on the readings, the short videos and the feature film.
Why is this?
Why can't he compromise?
Should he have compromised?
Does he have a compelling moral case for breaking the law by dynamiting the building he designed?
Recently Asked Questions
- What are two examples of the following and how are they formed Transform Boundary Continental Convergent Boundary Subduction Zone
- If I have 3 tubes in water with 50 degree: tube 1: 2 drops of 1-chlorobutane with 1cm3 ethanol tube 2: 2 drops 1-bromobutane with 1cm3 ethanol tube 3: 2 drops
- Conditional truth table Out of the four connectors how can I apply one the connectors to this example: Only the good die young