Professor Richard Schmalensee was the former Dean of the Sloan School of Management at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was also Microsoft's chief economic witness in its 1999 trial. He argued that Microsoft, while it may have a large market share, is not acting like a monopolist. In particular, it is not exercising its market power. His basic argument is that the current price of Windows 98, of around US$200, is far less than the price Microsoft would charge if it did, indeed, have a monopoly over operating systems.
Microsoft appears to have a monopoly with over 90 percent of the personal computer operating market. Why then would it not be charging a monopoly price? What factors might be diluting its market power?
See if you can come up with good rationales for Microsoft's lower than expected windows pricing.
Recently Asked Questions
- During research process,if search engines each have their own focus? For instance, does one bring up mostly popular culture references, while another focuses
- Please refer to the attachment to answer this question. This question was created from SPRING 2016 STA 371G HW5. Additional comments: "I'm having trouble
- A probation or parole officer would be considered guilty of __________ if he or she were to willfully fail to do something that a reasonable person normally