Question
Answered

Evaluation essay needed based on 1818 version Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

novel.  Minimum 750 words (of actual essay writing).  This must be AUTHENTIC work, and must be below 15% similarity when submitted to Turn It In.  You must be familiar with this novel (and specific version).
It is imperative that this is written in proper English and grammar is correct.  The attachment has the SPECIFIC instructions for the assignment.
There are sources that MUST be used for this essay.  I can not accept anything less. If instructions can't be followed please do not accept the assignment.
Ask questions PLEASE if you are unsure.  The attached instructions are very clear if read through.  


1 Attachment
Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Note: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment. For this assignment you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded. Now that you have completed Mary Shelley's Frankenstein , you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment. First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley's novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. Choose from among these sources : ipl2 Literary Criticism collection: If you use this site, you must choose from the first seven critiques listed as the final two are not scholarly : ( http://www.ipl.org/div/litcrit/bin/litcrit.out.pl?ti=fra-63 Professor Sherry Ginn's critique: 1 http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critique: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.html The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down! Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order: 1. Evaluate the critic/author: Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily) 2. Find the thesis of the article: What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein ? 3. Evaluate the thesis: 1 Note: You should avoid reading Ginn’s article too simplistically. A common misperception is that Ginn is arguing in favor of this novel being an autobiography, but if you read her article in full, you will find that this isn’t really the case. If you misinterpret your chosen source, it will affect your own arguments, so please read carefully. https://www.coursehero.com/file/14706680/2-Evaluation-Essay-102pdf/ This study resource was shared via CourseHero.com
Background image of page 1
3 pages
Answer & Explanation
Verified Solved by verified expert

ng eli

risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ul

Unlock full access to Course Hero

Explore over 16 million step-by-step answers from our library

Subscribe to view answer
1 Attachment
critique (1).docx
docx
Student review
100% (1 rating)