EVALUATE THE ARTICLE BELOW FOR GRAMMAR AND RHETORICAL STRUCTURE:
The article "Privatizing Air Traffic Control," written by Werner (June 2017), is a review of potential benefits of the privatization of air traffic control, and a link to the article can be found HERE . The purpose of the article is to outline a few of the pros and cons of taking such action. The article does not blatantly identify for or against, and attempts to maintain neutrality. It misses the mark, making a strong point in favor of the suggestion. This article targets those who would be regarded as subject matter experts in the field that would seek data on the subject.
Werner wrote this article to identify the feasibility of implementing privatization. Although no direct studies were done in the US, the author sites benefit seen by other nations, but counters the argument by noting how much larger the FAA's area of responsibility is. The article goes on to state that implementation under the current Presidential administration would have the best opportunity to champion privatization.
The article is well organized and written so that the information leads from a capturing story to useful data. The data sources are multiple, but there is an emphasis placed on the utilization of quoting experts. This is clearly due to the lack of applicable data since the US system is significantly different than the current models. The article does, however, leverage the data provided by the FAA for its implementation of NextGen. The author cites that due to sequestration and an increase in air traffic by 80%, NextGen is saving the taxpayer money. This shows that privatization at this current time may remain unfeasible.
Airlines currently foot the bill for air traffic control services in other countries. The main supporting argument for the article is that the cost for the operation will remain at the user level vs. tax-based. This would ensure fair use by all operators within the aviation community. NATCA argues that this will also assist with increasing safety due to the constant generation of revenue to match growing airspace use and alleviate safety concerns when playing "political chicken" during budgeting development.
The author makes for some excellent points supported by substantial evidence and remains rather neutral on the topic. Utilization of other countries' safety records to compare their successful privatization does not hinder the argument. It does, however, not make it as reliable since the primary mission of air traffic control is safety set by organizations that provide regulatory oversight.