I need somebody to edit this 2 page paper for me and make it sound...

I need somebody to edit this 2 page paper for me and make it sound more sophisticated and advanced (bigger words) and expand some more if possible. 

Also, if you can read the quotes and see if my explanations make sense, if not, please edit

Smith 1
Kali Smith
Professor Garver
PHL
23 October 2015
Reflection 2: Chapter 3
In The Trouble With Tolerance by Stanley Fish, Stanley wrote about the
mergence of tolerance as a central political and social category. Tolerance
can be defined as the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular
the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree
with. Stanley stated:
Once a group has rejected tolerance as a guiding principle and opted
instead for the cultural imperatives of the church or the tribe, it
becomes a candidate for intolerance that will be performed in the name
of tolerance; and at that moment any action against it – however
violent – is justified (Stanley).
This quote from Stanley is clearly starting that in the name of tolerance, if
anybody acts out of character there could be consequences, which could
possibly include a form of violence. Stanley also stated “liberal tradition he
initiated, tolerance, rather than being a wholly benevolent and inclusive
practice, is an engine of exclusion and a technology of regulation” (Stanley).
This means that tolerance, which should have been originally something, that