This question has been answered
Question
Annotated BibliographyThere are three parts of the annotation: 1. Summarize each source, briefly.
2. Explain how each source may be of help to you for the future essay.
3. Explain why the source is credible and academic.
Note: I have already completed Step one. Step 2 and 3 needs to be inputed into the annotated bibliography.
Running head: BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Annotated Bibliography
Michael P. Cabanayan
Transactional Leaders Vs. Transformational Leaders
University of Phoenix
Professor Kim Karaff
2
The topic of the essay chosen from week one is a persuasive essay about Transactional
Leader Vs. Transformational Leader to depict which presidential candidate is most qualified
to be elected as President and to distinguish the category Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
fall under.
Barbuto, J. E. Jr. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational
leadership: A test of antecedents.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11
(4),
26-40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/203138752?accountid=12085
Dr. Barbuto is the Director of the Center for Leadership at California State University at
Fullerton and is an associate professor of organizational behavior in leadership for the
Department of management at my Mihaylo College of Business and Economics. Dr.
Barbuto earned his PhD in business administration from the University of Rhode Island, an
MBA from Bentley University in a BS in business administration from the University of
Maine. The focus of Barbuto's peer-reviewed article is to examine the distinguishing
characteristics between transformational and charismatic leadership behaviors based on
variable criteria. These behaviors were significantly correlated based on transformational
and charismatic analytical breakdowns. The use of intrinsic process motivation showed a
correlation with transformational leadership behaviors, indicating that the transformational
leaders that motivated their staff by enjoyment at work were more likely to self report an
ideology consistent with both charismatic and transformational leadership behaviors. It is
noted that overall motivation has provided clear evidence for the promise as a decedent to a
full range of leadership models. The results of this article have some selection and
leadership development implications for example, particular leadership styles such as
transformational, are sought out by organizations that are seeking to enhance the internal
environmental culture of their organization and staff. It should be noted that the article
cautioned practitioners do not overestimate the significance of a leader’s source of
motivation for their particular leadership style. The results from the article's research
provide several our communities for future research on the relationship between motivation
and leadership style. More rigorous research procedures will also improve on this topic. The
article concluded, citing that its results were consistent with the Kegan's 1982 study of the
constructive developmental view of human motivation and how it is impacted by leadership
formation and development.
Guay, R. P. (2013). The relationship between leader fit and transformational leadership.
Journal
of Managerial Psychology, 28
(1), 55-73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941311298869
Dr. Guay received a BS in management from Northern Illinois University, an MBA from
Northern Illinois University, and a PhD in organizational behavior/human resources from
the University of Iowa. Guay is currently an assistant professor in the Department of
management at the University of Northern Iowa. The purpose of Guay’s peer-reviewed
article was to further examine the antecedents of transformational leadership by examining
End of preview
Comparison-Contrast
Michael Cabanayan
ENG220
September 11, 2016
Mr. Kim Karaf
IntroducTon
I am wriTng on voTng for Hillary Clinton vs. voTng for Donald ±rump. In this essay, I will give and
prove primarily the three reasons why voTng for Hillary Clinton is a be²er poliTcal approach.
FreewriTng
For my ³rst prewriTng method, I chose freewriTng. I wrote down several ideas from each of
their backgrounds to consider who deserves my vote in November as President. Free WriTng
help me develop my body paragraphs and topic sentence in my introducTon. Although I came
across an abundance of research, I have yet to narrow down the details to use in my essay.
Outlining
My second prewriTng method is an outlining.
When outlining, I used a plethora of researched
informaTon and came across three reason why Clinton will make a be²er candidate than
±rump. Using the outlining approach helped me to ³gure out which three reason I will probably
use as three body paragraphs. Along with the three body paragraphs, I outlined a few details
and examples to support each reason given. I was not able to generate a theses using my
outline; however, it is usable.
End of preview
Answered by Expert Tutors
trices ac magna. Fu
ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliqu
fficitur laoreet. Nam risus ant
s a molesti
fficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Donec aliquet. L
doc
Subject:
Arts & Humanities, English
487,593 students got unstuck by Course
Hero in the last week
Our Expert Tutors provide step by step solutions to help you excel in your courses