View the step-by-step solution to:

Abstract: This paper looks at Rating of the U. Country Risk. Perspectives of foreign and U. based MNCs". A case study approach was used to...

Please Comment on and evaluate the following research paper taking the of the attached Review into account


Total work should be 1 page and a half



Abstract: This paper looks at Rating of the U.S. Country Risk. Perspectives of foreign and U.S. based MNCs". A case study approach was used to identify the risks arising out of doing business . Table of Contents: Introduction …………………………………………………………………. .…3 Theoretical background ………………………………………………………….3 Research methods ………………………………………………………………. .6 Research strategy …………………………………………………………………7 1
Background image of page 01
Data collection ……………………………………………………………………8 Sample collection …. .…………………………………………………………….8 Main Results ………………………………………………………………………8 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………. .12 Limitations of the study ……………………………………………………………12 References………………………………………………………………………….13 Introduction: Businesses which want to set up shop in America are faced with the daunting task of understanding whether they would be sustainable and if their investments in America would pay off. They would also be interested to understand if the USA is a favored destination for attracting foreign investment. This paper tries to look at those factors that foreign investors look at while trying to set up their business in USA. It has been found that there are four factors which determine whether foreign direct investment is USA can be made good 2
Background image of page 02
Show entire document
Research Paper - Peer Evaluation Title Paper: Excellent Good Poor Remarks 0. Example 1. Critical Thinking X Analysis X Expertise in field X Having read your paper, I can say without hesitation that you have good understanding of the subject. Originality of thought X I found it interesting that you used a lot of examples from IT sector. 2. Comprehensiveness X Clear argumentation X All relevant information used X 3. Clarity and Organization X Your paper is very well organized and easy to navigate. Title page X Title may be a little confusing - "Rating of the US Country Risk. Perspectives of foreign and US-based MNCs". Abstract X Abstract uses almost the same words as title page and is bit confusing too. Content list incl. pages X Very neatly, clearly organized. Elements of main body X You followed paper guidelines closely - nothing to add. Acknowledgements and references X I wish you'd reference some real-life, specific US- and foreign- based MNCs in your paper. 4. Professionalism X Paper could be formatted a little more carefully. I saw a lot of extra spaces, punctuation errors, run-on sentences, etc Adherence to academic standards X As it relates to structure of your paper, I think it's pretty wells composed and adheres to academic standards. Quality of sources X Wide range of academic sources - excellent. Range of sources X I wish there was more non-academic refernces (magazines, current events, real-life case studies, etc) General Remarks 1/2/3/4 are the general categories overall, but you should also provide an feedback with regard to the criteria below. Explanation which parts you maybe found excellent, poor and good and argumentation why you evaluate this category to be good overall as marked in the columns left of this box. I enjoyed reading your paper, to some degree. I believe you've spend too much space/effort on purely theoretical approach. As much as I understand that it is important to explain theory and methodology of your work, in my opinion you just paid too much attention to it. I found first part of your paper (Theoretical Background) a little too lengthy. I read it looking for specific US-related risk information but wasn't able to find it there. Same comment may be applied to remaining parts of your paper, but to a lesser degree. Your paper is very comprehensive - each part of it attempts to cast wide net and organize a lot of information in an abridged form. I think you succeeded at distilling most relevant information on the subject. I sometimes had a problem judging your argumentation because most of your writing seems like a collection of different academic theories which you don't necessary support or oppose (and only use as a reference). I did not see any references to credit ratings of USA provided by any of the big three rating agencies. I think this is crucial part of information missing from your paper. First off, I wanted to congratulate on choosing interesting topic. I am sure most of the class have choosen different country to analyze risk of and noone thought about analyzing U.S. I wished you'd used more real-life examples and references and not limit yourself to theoretical part. However, your paper was informative and I've learned new things by reading it.
Background image of page 1
Sign up to view the entire interaction

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

-

Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question