Derek is on trial for burglary in a federal district court. While investigating the crime scene, detectives discovered a piece of cheese left at the scene with teeth marks on it. The prosecution claims that the teeth marks were made by Derek and seeks to offer the testimony of Dr. Jacobs, a dentist who is an expert on dental identification. The prosecution would have Dr. Jacobs testify that there have been written up in peer-reviewed forensic journals, that is has a very low false positive rate, and that it is generally accepted by criminalists as a method of identification. Dr. Jacobs' testimony is
A. Admissible because there has been adequate showing that bite-mark identification is scientifically valid.
B. Admissible because there has been an adequate showing that bite-mark identification is generally accepted in the field.
C. Inadmissible because the evidence is not relevant to an issue in the case.
D. Inadmissible because Dr. Jacobs is not qualified to be treated as an expert
E. None of the above
Recently Asked Questions
- 28. Starling Co. is considering disposing of a machine with a book value of $22,800 and estimated remaining life of five years. The old machine can be sold for
- 27.Blaser Corporation had $1,016,000 in invested assets, sales of $1,244,000, income from operations amounting to $234,000 and a desired minimum rate of return
- 26.Assume that Division Blue has achieved a yearly income from operations of $158,000 using $1,126,000 of invested assets. If management has set a minimum