Asked by meghanb622
Consider what Thomas Schelling means by the “diplomacy of...
Image transcription text
Consider what Thomas Schelling means by the "diplomacy of violence". Why does he draw distinctions between coercion and brute force? Why does say that the use of violence should be strategic? Can you give an example? According to James Fearon, why are realist assumptions about anarchy inadequate as a cause of war? If war is costly, whyT can't states bargain their way around it? How do problems of private information (informational asymmetries), commitment problems, and issue indivisihilities add to our causal understanding of war? According to Robert Jervis, what are security dilemmas and how do they often lead rational actors into conflict?
This question was created from IR Exam III Study Guide
Unlock full access to Course Hero
Explore over 16 million step-by-step answers from our library
Get answerOur verified expert tutors typically answer within 15-30 minutes.