Solved by Expert Tutors
Solved by Expert Tutors
Question

e)  Gresilda Greede  (Plaintiff)  v.  Nathan Naïve  (Defendant) 

 

Facts:  Nathan Naïve signed an agreement as shown below. Although Mr. Naïve received no consideration in the agreement, Ms. Greede is suing him, claiming that he signed under seal. Therefore, no consideration is necessary to bind him to the agreement. Is Nathan bound to the agreement. Why? (1 mark)




                                    


                                                                        Nathan Naïve    

                                                            Nathan Naïve

 


Judgment (1 mark):

 

 

Reasons for Judgment (2 marks): 

Step-by-step answer

triacinia pulvi

consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequa

sum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam lacinia pulvinar tortor nec facilisis. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoree

Subscribe to view the full answer

Subject: Law, Social Science

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question