Truth tables are related to Euler circles. Arguments in the form of Euler circles can be translated into statements using the basic connectives and the negation as follows:

Let p be “The object belongs to set A.” Let q be “the object belongs to set B.”

All A is B is equivalent to p ------> q.

No A is B is equivalent to p ----> ~ q.

Some A is B is equivalent to p ^ q.

All A is not B is equivalent to p ^ ~ q.

Determine the validity of the next arguments by using Euler circles, then translate the states into logical statements using the basic connectives, and truth tables, determine the validity of the arguments. Compare and explain your answers.

(a) No A is B.

Some C is A.

Some C is not B.

(b) All B is A.

All C is A.

All C is B.

Let p be “The object belongs to set A.” Let q be “the object belongs to set B.”

All A is B is equivalent to p ------> q.

No A is B is equivalent to p ----> ~ q.

Some A is B is equivalent to p ^ q.

All A is not B is equivalent to p ^ ~ q.

Determine the validity of the next arguments by using Euler circles, then translate the states into logical statements using the basic connectives, and truth tables, determine the validity of the arguments. Compare and explain your answers.

(a) No A is B.

Some C is A.

Some C is not B.

(b) All B is A.

All C is A.

All C is B.

### Recently Asked Questions

- An increase in the market price of men's haircuts, from $ 20 20 per haircut to $ 30 30 per haircut, initially causes a local barbershop to have

- Read the fact pattern below and answer the following questions in paragraph format. 1. Ms. Smith is very angry. Who will she sue and why? What claim or

- I can not find what main points Eric Avila makes in "revisiting the chavez ravine" i have to compare it to culture clashes "chavez ravine". How do i go about