Prove using natural deduction rules, give a formal proof (1)(P v R) -> (Q v s) from the premise Q -> Q, R -> S

(2) (~P v Q) -> (P->Q)

(2) (~P v Q) -> (P->Q)

### Recently Asked Questions

- On a certain route, a regional airline carries 8500 per month, each paying $65. The airline wants to increase the fare. However, the market research department

- How are classroom procedures different than classroom rules? Explain what it means to teach, model, and practice your procedures along with your beliefs on

- Assume that J&J has a few high-value business objectives that are codified in the new operating model and EA. These are: · Develop a