1) what is religion not?
2) Select one of the following proofs for the existence of God:
the ontological, cosmological, or teleological proof. Explain how the proof attempts to explain God's existence and identify the associated with your selected proof. What are the merits of the argument? What does the argument take seriously about God's existence?
3) Now, identify at least two counterarguments against the proof you selected in the previous question. Who is the philosopher associated with each counterargument? What do they say is flawed about the ontological or cosmological or teleological proof? What are the merits of their counterargument?