View the step-by-step solution to:


This question was created from PHIL- 5 questions (assignment #2)


lies15 Lilat W
implies that we could have done otherwise than we did. We do not hold a dog morally responsible for
chewing up our philosophy book or hold a one-month-old baby responsible for crying, because they
could not help it, but we do hold a twenty-year-old student responsible for his cheating because (we
believe) he could have done otherwise. That determinism is incompatible with moral responsibility and
must be rejected can be defended in the following argument. Since in order to have a moral duty to do
Act A we must be able to do A and able to refrain from doing A, it follows that being morally
responsible for doing A entails that I could have done otherwise if I had chosen to do so. Determinism
holds that our actions are merely the product of the laws of nature and antecedent states of affairs. So,
determinism entails that we do not make choices. Thus, if determinism is true we are not morally
responsible for what we do. But our moral responsibility for our actions is self-evidently true. Therefore,
determinism with respect to
action must be rejected

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Let our 24/7 Philosophy tutors help you get unstuck! Ask your first question.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors