Question Get Answer

multiple choice

Why does Rousseau reject natural law teachings?
He claims that natural law is something invented after-the-fact - in other words, we develop natural law teachings in order to talk ourselves into doing what is naturally right after we have been corrupted by society.
Rousseau claims these theories mean that human beings must have used the faculty of philosophic reason to develop society, but that faculty of reasoning only develops within society, and really only within a society of a certain
kind. So there is a fundamental incoherence in saying that natural law is discovered outside of society and then leads us into it.
Natural law is a name given to discoveries of reason. Since we don't know what natural humanity is - we only know what human beings are in the state of civilization, which alters them - it's vain to speak of natural law. We don't
know human nature, so how can we speak of natural law?
All of these.
. None of these.

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Let our 24/7 Philosophy tutors help you get unstuck! Ask your first question.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes