View the step-by-step solution to:

Rogerian Argument about Facebook Introduction Social networking sites (SNS) are a rapidly growing segment of social interaction all over the world....

Does Social Media enhance interpersonal relationships

Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words] Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
  • If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
  • Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
Explain a strong objection to your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
  • Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
  • Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]


Rogerian Argument about Facebook Introduction Social networking sites (SNS) are a rapidly growing segment of social interaction all over the world. (McCafferty 19)They serve as a source of information for individuals and groups as well as a source of relative connectivity between individuals who know one another in the real world and to allow connections between people who share common interests but might not know one another outside a SNS. (Houghton & Joinson 75) The interconnectivity of the sites, in this paper the focus will be on Facebook the most popular of the SNS service, can serve as a foundational support network for information and to build and or maintain social connections, yet it also has the potential to leave individuals vulnerable to fraudulent and bad behaviors by others as well as a public arena for the exposition of one’s own bad behaviors. Some people claim that the potential for connectivity, and especially international connectivity issues associated with a global world view, mandate the support of the broader community for SNS sites and activities. (McCafferty) Conversely others argue that the potential for violations of privacy and inappropriate (or illegal) activities make SNS an insurmountable threat to individuals that should be tightly controlled if not stopped all together. (Kugler) (Haughton & Joinson) (Chaulk & Jones) The reality is that with the advent of almost any new technology there are both positive and negative possible outcomes, and in the case of social networking sites the potential of each can be exponential. Therefore Facebook should have high levels of easy to use choice on the part of the consumer, as to what he or she is willing to share and with who and should also have a low level of tolerance for illegal and bad behavior on the part of users all while protecting this
Background image of page 01
Student Last Name 2 functional and useful new social tool. (McCafferty) (Kayri1 & Çakır) (Kodrich &Laituri) (Carroll & Landry) Argument in Favor of Greater Controls or Elimination of Facebook Facebook can and often does create conflict in interpersonal relationships through inappropriate behaviors of its users. The kind of conflict it generates can be associated with information sharing that is beyond acceptable to “all” of one’s connections and therefore offensive or even incriminating to self or others. Something that might seem benign to one person might turn out to be highly offensive, invasive or incriminating to others. (Chaulk & Jones 246) The resulting circumstances can be surprising and emotionally stressful for some involved. (Houghton & Joinson 82) In some recent examples the shaming of an individual for public actions that were seen as offensive by some created reportedly sever reactions in those involved, while others were sanctioned with job loss as a result of online posts on his or her SNS page. (Houghton & Joinson 77) These situations and others bring to mind a need to carefully control the venue of the SNS, so that individuals are in the least aware of the possibility of connectivity associated with posting and or the posting activities of others. This is also to say nothing of the two other important issues that can be seen in SNS activity, cyber-bullying or stalking and fraudulent economic scams. (Chaulk & Jones) (Kugler) Lastly there is also a valid argument that has been present prior to Facebook where psychologists and others fear harm to introverted individuals because the venue allows them to avoid real life social contact. (Ryan & Xenos) The kind of connectivity that feeds such offensive results is made possible only by the very existence of
Background image of page 02
Show entire document
On Facebook one can and often does create conflict through actions of its users. The kind of conflict it generates can be associated with information sharing that is beyond acceptable to "all" of one's connections and, therefore, offensive or even incriminating to self or others. Something that might seem non-threatening to one person might turn out to be highly aggressive, invasive or be incriminating to others. P1: Facebook often creates conflict from it users through inappropriate behaviors P2: Facebook is in need of greater controls or elimination C: Therefore, Facebook should have stricter controls and even the elimination of some more free features or even the site itself. Something that might seem non-threatening to one person might turn out to be highly offensive, invasive or incriminating to others. The resulting circumstances can be surprising and emotionally stressful for some involved. In some recent examples, the shaming of an individual for public actions that were seen as offensive by some created reportedly severe reactions in those involved, while others were fired from their job as a result of online posts on his or her Facebook page. [CITATION Hou05 \l 1033 ] This kind of connectivity that feeds such offensive results is made possible only by the very existence of Facebook, which creates, at least, the illusion of anonymity and protection of distance for the knowing offender but also demonstrates fertile ground for self-incrimination by sharing of information that others might see as a violation of privacy. The arguments that support the dismantling or the mandating of severe legal and therefore (physical) restrictions are
Background image of page 1
supported by the fact that these events occur and often occur, some with relatively low results and others with extraordinary but disastrous results. In this context, the validity of stricter controls and even the elimination of some more free features or even the site itself seem plausible as like many other forms of technology the potential for human harm is great. Additionally, the basic idea that the consumer is ultimately responsible for self-protection seems to be lacking in this instance as so much becomes out of control in a web of infinite connectivity. The design of Facebook is geared toward encouraging "social interaction in a virtual environment. In general, communication is facilitated by information posted in the pro±le (i.e., the user's personal page), which often includes a photograph of the member and personal information describing his or her interests, both of which provide information about one's identity. P1: Facebook can and has allowed Individuals and groups to access rapid information, such as national disaster. P2: Facebook user can connect in real-time as events occur and post info on Disaster Message Board. C: Therefore, Facebook links in real-time, as events occur allowing people to streamline post- disaster communications even further. Though some would argue that the manner in which users use Facebook does not always lend itself to social interaction, i.e. that individuals usually only interact directly with those they know in real life or on topical levels with those they do not, this does not negate the context of the possibility of enormous social and cultural sharing.
Background image of page 2
Show entire document
Sign up to view the entire interaction

Top Answer

How social media has... View the full answer

how social media has enhanced interpersonal relationships.docx

How Social Media has enhanced interpersonal relationships
Name
Institution
Date Introduction
Social media is defined as the use of web-based and mobile technologies to turn
communication into...

Sign up to view the full answer

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

-

Educational Resources
  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Ask a homework question - tutors are online