View the step-by-step solution to:

Question

This question was created from Progressivism Ch 28.pdf https://www.coursehero.com/file/24716168/Progressivism-Ch-28pdf/

24716168-398007.jpeg
24716168-398007.jpeg

Source: Clayton Antitrust Act, October 15, 1914
That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly to discriminate in price between different
purchasers of commodities which commodities are sold for use, consumption, or resale within the United States, where the effect of such discrimination may be to
substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. . . . That the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.
Nothing contained in the antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the existence and operation of labor organizations.
f. Interpretation of Document with H and one of IPP - one or two complete sentences that include both HIPP and how it supports your X or Y:
Does this document contradict or corroborate another?
Does it contradict or corroborate your thesis?
Which paragraph could you use this in? [X, A , or B]
Source: Hammer v. Dagenhart, 1918.
(Suit was brought] by a father in his own behalf and . . . his two minor sons, one under the age of fourteen years and the other between the age of fourteen and sixteen
years, employees in a cotton mill at Charlotte, North Carolina, to enjoin [stop] the enforcement of the act of Congress intended to prevent interstate commerce in the
products of child labor. .. . The controlling question for this decision, is it within the authority of Congress in regulating commerce among the states to prohibit the
transportation in interstate commerce of manufactured goods, the product of a factory in which . .. children under the age of fourteen and sixteen years have been
employed or permitted to work more than eight hours in any day, or more than six days in any week? In our view, the necessary effect of this act is purely a state
authority. Thus, the act in a two-fold sense is repugnant to the Constitution. .. . [Ijt not only transcends the authority delegated to Congress over commerce, but also
exerts a power as to a purely local matter.
E. Interpretation of Document with H and one of IPP - one or two complete sentences that include both HIPP and how it supports your X or Y:
Does this document contradict or corroborate another?
Does it contradict or corroborate your thesis?
Which paragraph could you use this in? [X, A , or B]

Recently Asked Questions

Why Join Course Hero?

Course Hero has all the homework and study help you need to succeed! We’ve got course-specific notes, study guides, and practice tests along with expert tutors.

  • -

    Study Documents

    Find the best study resources around, tagged to your specific courses. Share your own to gain free Course Hero access.

    Browse Documents
  • -

    Question & Answers

    Get one-on-one homework help from our expert tutors—available online 24/7. Ask your own questions or browse existing Q&A threads. Satisfaction guaranteed!

    Ask a Question
Let our 24/7 Political Science tutors help you get unstuck! Ask your first question.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors