Say an individual is faced with the decision of whether to buy auto insurance or not (like before laws in many
states changed). The states of nature are that an accident occurs (with probability .008) and no accident occurs (with probability .992).
Here is the payoff table for the decision maker
State of Nature
Decision No Accident Accident
Purchase insurance -500 -500
Do not purchase Ins. 0 -10000
a-what is the expected monetary value of each decision and which is the best for the decision maker?
b-say the individual is a risk avoider. Show a table with plausible values of utility for the risk avoider, calculate the expected utility of each decision and state which decision is best based on the expected utility idea.
Consider the following two-person, zero-sum game
Player A b1 b2
A1 -1 2
A2 4 -3
c-explain why neither player has a dominant strategy here.
d-determine the optimal mixed strategy solution.
e-What is the value of the game?
Recently Asked Questions
- The number of power outages at Grenlec has a Poisson distribution with a mean of 6 outages per year. The probability that there will be between 1 and 3 power
- At a certain hospital, 60% of the gunshot victims are from the south, 30% are from the north, and the remaining 10% are from another country. All gunshot
- What is the age distribution of patients who make office visits to a doctor or nurse? The following table is based on information taken from a medical journal.