OK for the first question given the null and alternate hypothesis I was asked to answer the result of the hypothesis basically rather the null hypothesis holds up or do I have to move to he alternate hypothesis given the following information the instructor provided with a mean time of 2.8, 100 test subjects, with a std. deviation of 1hr, and tested at a 0.05% level of significance. I am using this study to either support the H0 or the H1
For the second question I just need the hypothesis statement I made clarified I guess my instructor thought the z)0.02 was wrong he wanted me to explain my rejection criteria for the hypothesis. I think maybe the number of test subjects are too high or something because the z was pretty high on the sample number I presented.
The way to approach this... View the full answer